tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5596708332568087278.post3514113950808456167..comments2024-01-24T10:39:27.668-05:00Comments on Coming Untrue: Passing Thoughts on Fred PhelpsDr. S. L. Andersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06303707167715370504noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5596708332568087278.post-19701119922720756642019-01-03T12:51:45.118-05:002019-01-03T12:51:45.118-05:00Since we are recycling, might as well do the same....Since we are recycling, might as well do the same. As I had commented previously: <br /><br />The main defense by the left of homosexuality and main arguments against it's critics is that the critics do not recognize that homosexuality is just another way to love, and love is, of course, condoned especially in the Bible. <br /><br />Clearly it's an attempt at a sly intellectual misdirection that the homosexual lobby thinks works for them. <br /><br />What they are of course deliberately ignoring is that biblical love is not love of blueberry pie and sexual thrill but unselfish love of neighbor that helps him/her grow in love of God and has his/her eternal well being and salvation in mind. Since homosexuality has nothing to do with that but will achieve exactly the opposite (based on the existing infuriatingly clear biblical teaching) it is the height of self serving deception, cynicism, and foolishness on part of the homosexual lobby to propose otherwise.<br /><br />By contrast, because of Christian love no one in a Christian Church community of any denomination would therefore object for anyone to attend and try to work out their personal standing and salvation with their creator. It is if course clear that, as in all life situations, there will be a spectrum of attitudes and abilities that a person has to deal with which will not make this perfect on part of the community. But that would be mutual wouldn't it and therefore needs to be overlooked by both sides.<br />Qmannoreply@blogger.com