tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5596708332568087278.post4161625020979733506..comments2024-01-24T10:39:27.668-05:00Comments on Coming Untrue: One of These Things …Dr. S. L. Andersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06303707167715370504noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5596708332568087278.post-10318113075179363412015-03-12T17:31:11.813-04:002015-03-12T17:31:11.813-04:00Somehow the link I meant to include got lost. The ...Somehow the link I meant to include got lost. The full article can be found here.<br /><br />http://www.crisismagazine.com/2015/progress-worlds-first-three-way-gay-marriageQmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5596708332568087278.post-33268079696244735512015-03-12T14:59:42.967-04:002015-03-12T14:59:42.967-04:00Thanks, Q. This is where the world is headed. If y...Thanks, Q. This is where the world is headed. If you disagree, get your shots in now. A "free and open internet" under the FCC is on its way, and you can guess what that means for opinions that dissent from the progressivist agenda.<br /><br />http://www.cnet.com/news/president-obama-calls-on-fcc-to-keep-internet-free-and-open/ Tomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00346761712248157930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5596708332568087278.post-30300884626489420792015-03-12T14:40:21.695-04:002015-03-12T14:40:21.695-04:00Here it comes, as predicted. See this article:
Pr...Here it comes, as predicted. See this article:<br /><br />Progress!” The World’s First Three-Way Gay Marriage<br /><br />From <br /><br />Three homosexual men have “married” each other in Thailand in what is being billed as the world’s first three-way same-sex “marriage.” This was, of course, inevitable. It’s inevitable in every country that redefines marriage as anything but one man and one woman. When the culture’s only standard for “marriage” is that the parties love each other, then all sorts of novel configurations are possible. Look for this to come soon to a country near you.<br />Under the banner of the gay-rights rainbow, the new cultural revolutionaries are not only redefining marriage but also, to borrow from the popular term of 1960s radicals, “smashing monogamy.” What’s to stop these three non-monogamous married men from taking on added spouses? If three is fine, why not four? Or five?<br />This is, of course, a blatant I-told-you-so moment. This is what we gay-marriage opponents have been warning about. But it’s especially revealing of something else I’ve warned about for a while.<br />Those of us opposing same-sex “marriage” for reasons like this were told by gay-marriage advocates that we were nuts. Our claims that the redefining of marriage would lead to polygamous marriage and other arrangements were ridiculed. We were denounced as homophobes and bigots who simply hate. We were not just cold-hearted but hysterical. They shouted at us that they would never advocate arrangements like these. We were crazy to even suggest they would support anything but two gay people marrying one another.<br />But we know better. Those of us who have studied the ideological train-wreck called “progressivism” know better. We’ve watched how progressives “progress.” The only thing you really know about progressives, and that they know about themselves, is that they’re always changing, evolving. Where they stand now, on any given issue, is, by progressivism’s own definition, subject to change. ….Qmannoreply@blogger.com