![]() |
By the oddest of coincidences, the standard of the Nineveh Protection Units looks like ... a compass. |
“I did it my way.”
— Paul Anka
“I’ve got my own way. I can find my own way.”
— Duran Duran
“In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes.”
— Judges 21:25
Ah, the conscience.
The Function of Conscience
On one hand, each individual’s conscience must be the final
arbiter of his or her choices; a moral compass. While there is plenty of
direction out there in the word of God to provide sound guidance for life, in
the end, how that is applied and whether or not it is followed is down to each
one of us. It can be no other way.
On the other hand, for society to function at all reasonable
limits must be set and certain types of conduct proscribed, punished or frowned
upon. This holds true whether we talk about the Islamic State, any modern nation
or even Israel under the Law of God thousands of years ago. But really,
provided you are prepared to risk the legal or social consequences of your
actions when they are discovered, the only limits on you in this life are those
of conscience and opportunity.
That’s a scary thought. Trusting your fellow citizens to
abide by a standard of good and evil that exists primarily between their own
ears does not inspire confidence or a feeling of security. Still, the
alternative is scarier: a near-omniscient government that screens for badthink
and reeducates or disposes of any citizens who might step outside the arbitrary
boundaries of whatever it currently considers acceptable seems a greater evil.
C.S. Lewis’s The Abolition of Man is among the best possible explorations of that subject.
Damaging the Equipment
A conscience informed by scripture deftly applied to the
human heart by the Holy Spirit is the best possible guide in a fallen world.
But conscience is malleable: as it can be trained, so it can also be seared and
function improperly.
So what do you do when your moral compass points south
instead of north?
Conscience and the Prodigal
Let me give you a familiar example: the prodigal of
Luke 15. The parable presumes a son with a working conscience. While he is
a sinner, he clearly can remember a personal relationship with a father to whom
he may appeal. The parable also presumes a son who grasps the distinction
between right and wrong and knows which side of the line he is on. His words of
repentance make both these things clear:
“Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son.”
Despite his extended period of depravity, his compass still
points the prodigal in the right direction. Such was the relationship of the
average Jew to his God in the day the Lord Jesus spoke his parable. The Jew
knew God as father, and the Law gave him understanding of the specific nature
of his crimes. He had both a sense of what he had done wrong and a place to get
back to when he realized how unhappy he had become. While there were times in
Israel’s history when the Law was not well understood by many of its people,
the nation was still far better off than those around it.
Nowhere to Turn
But we live in a day and among many who have little or no
awareness of a Father to whom they might return, and little consciousness that a
major contributing cause of much of life’s malaise or misery is their own
selfish choices. Society and often their own families quickly rally to their
support when they sin, not to say “we still love you” or “we’ll support you in
your efforts to change your ways” but to actively celebrate the sin itself. Social
media supporters assure the woman who has just taken her child’s life that she
is sensible, not selfish. Fawning talk show hosts tell the gay pop star how
brave it is to come out, driving his new single even higher on the charts.
That is not to say that scripture is irrelevant to the world
around us, but we need to realize that we are not living in the parable of the
prodigal son. We are living in Nineveh, where breaking your own compass is
actually trendy.
I’d stop short of saying the conscience is under attack like
never before, because it’s probably not true. Many cultures at many times in
human history have put pressure on their citizens to participate in all manner
of wickedness by redefining good and evil for the sake of government, commerce
or convenience. A very popular response to the activity of one’s conscience has
always been to seek comfort from those who reject the promptings of their own.
Setting Your Own Standards
What do you do when your compass is broken? One option is to
claim directions don’t matter and that any choice is as good as any other. But
the far more common reaction is to draw new lines in arbitrary places; to
create a unique and personal standard of acceptable conduct. Even the extreme
political Left strives to appear principled,
though the principles it embraces are those of Bizarro World, and cannot be
maintained in the face of logic or consistency.
The problem with setting your own standards is that they are
necessarily subjective. An Instructables
post with the title “How to Start Your Own Religion” currently has nearly 18,000
pageviews, which suggests that many people feel that a source of authority is
no more necessary to religious observance than to moral codes generally. And
indeed, if objective right and wrong do not exist, why not be a Pastafarian?
But objective right and wrong do exist. While consciences
differ in sensitivity and the sort of thing that will set them off, I know of
almost nobody who does not wish the whole world would sing to their tune. You
can feel free to hold that objective truth does not exist the moment you stop
forever from seeking to impose your views on anyone else. Any views at all. Atheists
may wish Christians and Muslims would cease disseminating their beliefs, but wishing it doesn’t give them a moment’s pause in aggressively proselytizing their anti-deism. And
while nominal agnostics may steer clear of propagating religious opinion, it
doesn’t stop them from fussing about global warming or their pet political cause du jour.
Even if your standard is that people shouldn’t have standards,
it’s still … er … a standard.
Doing the Math
The laws of probability will tell even the average high
school student that the chances of any of us coming up with a worldview from
scratch that bears even the faintest resemblance to reality are infinitesimal. If
there is truth to be found in the universe, it must necessarily be found
outside of my own very limited wisdom and experience.
Likewise, a conscience unmoored from the revelation of God
cannot hope to tell us anything useful or real. As much as it is a popular and
appealing conceit to imagine we can each draw our own lines between right and
wrong, any thinking person must eventually come to the conclusion that he or
she needs to adopt an external standard of morality.
In Nineveh it may be trendy to break your own compass, but if the place you make your home is under the judgment of God, where will you go without one?
No comments :
Post a Comment