A more current version of this post is available here.
“I don’t think that I’m a good Christian. I know I’m not. But even if I’m a bad one, I am one.” — Vox Day
- Home
- What We’re Doing Here
- F A Q
- 119
- Anonymous Asks
- Book Reviews
- The Commentariat Speaks
- Doesn’t Always Mean What We Think It Means
- Flyover Country
- How Not to Crash and Burn
- Inbox
- The Language of the Debate
- Letters from the Best Man
- Mining the Minors
- On the Mount
- Quote of the Day
- Recommend-a-blog
- Semi-Random Musings
- That Wacky Old Testament
- Time and Chance
- What Does Your Proof Text Prove?
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Saturday, January 11, 2014
Bible Study 04 — Comparison [Part 4]
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Bible Study
/
Genesis
Friday, January 10, 2014
For All People
I haven’t got any enemies. Really, I can’t think of a single
human being in that category. That’s not an indicator of an excessively
gracious or forgiving nature, by the way. It’s simply the truth.
I live in a peaceful country. There are, of course, differences of
opinion about religion, but I have never (yet) personally encountered any genuine
religious persecution. I realize this is exceptional, both in human history and in view of current conditions in the rest of the world. Try confessing
the name of Christ publicly in Iran, Egypt or Syria and see how that goes.
Even in Baghdad where, because of the US presence for over a decade one might assume it would be a little safer to identify as Christian, attacks
on two churches on Christmas day killed more than 30 worshippers.
Labels:
Prayer
Thursday, January 09, 2014
It Ain’t Over ’til it’s Over
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Christ
/
Christian Life
/
Eternal Reign
/
Psalms
Wednesday, January 08, 2014
Your Father Who Is In Secret
It takes courage to stand up and pray in public if you’re
shy by nature, but only a little more than must be mustered to spill your guts
on Facebook or Twitter. And judging by the number of people doing that, it must
feel pretty good. If you’re the type of person who by nature loves to be the
centre of attention, it doesn’t take any courage at all to pray in public. It’s
like swimming to a duck.
It certainly doesn’t require faith.
It doesn’t take faith to attend church meetings or to put
money in an offering box. These things may be done for right reasons or wrong reasons. Church, or even giving, can be a habit, a social
event, a way of feeling good about oneself, a duty or an obligation imposed
by family. Such acts are done visibly and because of that, there are other possible benefits than rewards of a spiritual kind.
They don’t require faith
They don’t require faith
Tuesday, January 07, 2014
In Need of Analysis: Public Prayer
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
In Need of Analysis
/
Prayer
/
Public Prayer
Monday, January 06, 2014
Impossible to Renew [Part 2]
Having established the context, therefore, we may move on to
a closer look at the passage in question:
“For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt. For land that has drunk the rain that often falls on it, and produces a crop useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God. But if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed, and its end is to be burned.” (Hebrews 6:4-8)This Passage does NOT Refer to Christians
Several phrases are used here which
seem to imply that the audience are believers: they have been “enlightened”, they
have “tasted the heavenly gift”, they have “shared in the Holy
Spirit”. This is strong language to use of the unsaved. Doesn’t it, then, refer to Christians? Despite the controversy on this subject, we
believe that the answer is no.
Labels:
Eternal Security
/
Hebrews
Sunday, January 05, 2014
Impossible to Renew [Part 1]
This passage in the book of Hebrews has caused consternation to many a believer, and been the source of much controversy among Christians generally:
Read superficially, it strikes fear into the heart, for it seems at first to imply that those who have put their faith in Christ for salvation can lose that salvation.
“For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt. For land that has drunk the rain that often falls on it, and produces a crop useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God. But if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed, and its end is to be burned.” (Hebrews 6:4-8)Eternal Insecurity
Read superficially, it strikes fear into the heart, for it seems at first to imply that those who have put their faith in Christ for salvation can lose that salvation.
Labels:
Eternal Security
/
Hebrews
Saturday, January 04, 2014
Unintended Consequences
When they passed The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA)
in 2007, it is quite unlikely that the U.S. congress anticipated that their
little bill would trigger a cereal grain price jump of 67.4% in 2012 over 2011,
or that the rise in food prices would plunge nearly 70 million people into
what the World Bank calls ‘extreme poverty’. The Houston Chronicle details the
extent of the problem here.
Good Intentions
What prompted the EISA? We are told it was the desire to reduce
dependency on foreign oil, scale back greenhouse gas emissions and keep the
price of gas down. None of these are bad ideas. While I am as easily attracted
to conspiracy theories as the next guy, I doubt the average elected
representative planned on starving the third world to reduce U.S. gas prices.
But the unintended consequences of the Act have caused and
continue to cause near-incalculable damage.
Labels:
Authority
/
Submission
Friday, January 03, 2014
Get with the Program(ming)
I've been looking at inline scripture references most of my life. You know what I mean: they look like this (Gal. 3:2).
From now on, at least in everything I post, they'll look a bit more like this. Unless of course the significance of the quote warrants that it be handled:
Online resources have made it redundant to insert inline references. Ordinarily I'd say let's put them there anyway "just in case". But I've always found they take me out of the writer's train of thought. And when anything is a hurdle to comprehension, we welcome its banishment.
So if you want to see a proof text from now on, click away.
From now on, at least in everything I post, they'll look a bit more like this. Unless of course the significance of the quote warrants that it be handled:
"Like this, and this, and this."in which case it will be quoted in full. Usually when I post, from the English Standard Version.
Online resources have made it redundant to insert inline references. Ordinarily I'd say let's put them there anyway "just in case". But I've always found they take me out of the writer's train of thought. And when anything is a hurdle to comprehension, we welcome its banishment.
So if you want to see a proof text from now on, click away.
In Need of Analysis: What Makes a Good Hymn?
It’s a question about which I have lots of ideas and few
definitive answers.
Instinctively I am drawn to lyrical authenticity, biblical
content, three to four verses max (or my voice wears out) and a decent melody, not so quick or difficult that the average person can’t
sing it. That’s important, I think. Take On Me, for instance, is a pretty pop song by the Norwegian band a-ha, with a soaring chorus. As the melody of a hymn it would be excruciating.
I dislike dirges and choruses that sound cheesy or dated to
me. I dislike anything trite. If it sounds like a sales pitch, a pep rally, or
frivolous, I’d rather not, thanks.
Labels:
Hymns
/
In Need of Analysis
Thursday, January 02, 2014
Inbox: How Can God Allow Evil?
A reader emails a thought on a post earlier this week:
“There’s more to be said on this subject: What would a situation look like in which human beings were fallen, but creation itself was not? Or what would a situation look like wherein evil type 1 (human evil) would be present but evil type 2 (i.e. ‘natural’ evils like earthquakes and cancer) were not possible?
Bible Study 03 — Comparison [Part 3]
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Bible Study
/
Original Sin
Wednesday, January 01, 2014
No Passage Back
A more current version of this post may be found here.
Labels:
New Year
/
Philippians
How Can God Allow Evil?
People who wonder how a loving God could allow people to go
to hell often pose this question as well. But the very act of asking it
defeats the argument, for the first question assumes that God judges too
harshly, the other that He does not judge harshly enough!
Where Evil Grows
Where Evil Grows
Evil does not float around unattached, like a big black
cloud over the earth. Rather, evil originates in men’s hearts and is committed by men. Sin and death came into
the world when Adam disobeyed God in Eden. God could have destroyed mankind
then, but He chose to redeem us instead.
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Abiding in Christ
Christians are divided in their understanding of what Jesus
wanted us to do when He charged His followers to ‘abide’ in Him in John 15.
Soon after my conversion I read through a biography of
Hudson Taylor; it told of his struggle to understand how this command was to be
applied in his life. I read and re-read the story. I went on to read a number
of devotional commentaries that dealt with this subject. Many seemed to be
telling me to pray more fervently or read the word more diligently. This was
good advice, yet the way to enter into this heightened experience of eternal
life (that is what I thought it offered) still eluded me; I was trying to apply
His words to my need in the 21st century before I understood them in the light
of the situation facing His disciples in the 1st century. I saw it as something
I had to learn to do, a level of Christian living which I hadn’t experienced
yet.
Was abiding some state to which only the super-spiritual
attained?
Labels:
Abiding in Christ
/
Colin Anderson
/
Discipleship
/
Israel the Vine
/
the True Vine
Monday, December 30, 2013
So What About Cain’s Wife?
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Cain's Wife
/
Contradictions in Scripture
/
Hope in Christ
Sunday, December 29, 2013
The Truth Is Out There
I have often thought pityingly of people who lived before
Christ, especially those who lived before God’s Law was written down for Moses
and Israel: How did those poor savages go about pleasing God? What were their
chances of avoiding punishment — let alone of successfully navigating their way
to eternal life — without any clear directions?
I suppose my underlying assumption was that God had somehow
been unfair to them. How do we explain that?
Saturday, December 28, 2013
Bible Study 02 — Comparison [Part 2]
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Bible Study
/
Bible Translations
Friday, December 27, 2013
Two Genealogies
Whenever people speak of supposed contradictions in the Bible, the example of Christ’s two genealogies is sure to come up. The one in Matthew seems to be only 42 generations long from Abraham to Christ, while the one in Luke covers 56 from Abraham to Christ. Luke says that Heli was the father of Joseph, while Matthew says that Jacob was the father of Joseph. There are many other differences between the two genealogies, as well. How can both these accounts be correct?
Why Does it Matter?
The genealogy of Jesus is important, because anybody who claimed to be the Messiah had to be able to establish that they were a descendant of King David and heir to his throne, as the prophets had foretold (2 Sam. 7:12-13; Is. 9:6, 11:1-5; Jer. 23:5). So any accusation that Jesus’ genealogies are wrong is a serious one. However, both clearly show that Jesus is a descendant of David, so no matter what other conclusions one may reach about the genealogies, they cannot be used to disqualify Jesus as the Messiah.
Why Does it Matter?
The genealogy of Jesus is important, because anybody who claimed to be the Messiah had to be able to establish that they were a descendant of King David and heir to his throne, as the prophets had foretold (2 Sam. 7:12-13; Is. 9:6, 11:1-5; Jer. 23:5). So any accusation that Jesus’ genealogies are wrong is a serious one. However, both clearly show that Jesus is a descendant of David, so no matter what other conclusions one may reach about the genealogies, they cannot be used to disqualify Jesus as the Messiah.
Labels:
Christ
/
Contradictions in Scripture
/
Genealogies
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)