It is never a good thing to be on the wrong
side of a theological question. Sometimes it’s disastrous.
But it’s also possible to be on the right
side of a question while making the wrong sort of argument: one that cannot be
substantiated or does not prove your point.
Kent Rieske is trying to make the case that the Calvinistic definition of “election” is not a biblical one. I’d argue his
basic thesis is correct.