The devil may be in the details, but far-reaching doctrinal errors are all in the broad strokes and
almost never in the minutia. I’m becoming convinced of it.
My test case at the moment is the expanded edition of Kim Riddlebarger’s A Case for
Amillennialism: Understanding the End Times (2013), in the
event you’re wondering. But I have found the same thing with several books I’ve
read recently: they advance a fundamentally flawed major premise. Once you’ve
done that, you can pile up the proof texts to highest heaven without
successfully proving anything. Your original, glaring defect of thought makes
them all irrelevant to the greater argument.