“Were animals created carnivorous?”
We know
from Genesis 9 that mankind was not originally
carnivorous, and
from Genesis 1 that animals too were originally herbivores. If that were not enough, two plain
statements in the New Testament about the introduction of death into our world
make conjectures about carnivorous animals in the original creation order a
bit … er … hard to swallow.
Not Originally Carnivorous
First, the apostle Paul writes in Romans that “sin came into
the world through one man, and death
through sin.” Then in 1 Corinthians he says, “For as by
a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the
dead.” Both verses teach that death did not exist before the fall of mankind.
The latter passage refers to death as an enemy
and tells us Christ will one day destroy it after putting all other
enemies under his feet. If, as the apostle taught, death not a normal feature of the creation order but rather an enemy that will
one day be eliminated entirely, it is difficult to imagine why death would have
any part at all in a creation God repeatedly calls “good”. And if animals did
not die prior to the fall of mankind, the question of carnivorous animal
behavior becomes a non-starter.
But in addition to the plain statements of scripture about
animals being originally herbivores and the theological problems posed by the
alternative, there are also pictures presented to us in the Old Testament
prophetic scriptures of the
millennial kingdom of the Lord Jesus, in which:
“The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together; and a little child shall lead them. The cow and the bear shall graze; their young shall lie down together; and the lion shall eat straw like the ox … They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain.”
It is reasonable to assume that if such conditions are
certain in the future of our planet, then they may as easily have occurred in the
unfallen creation order.
An Original Design with Unused Optional Features
But that still doesn’t completely answer the question. After
all, it is entirely possible both men and animals were created with the capability of digesting meat, but did
not use that feature of their makeup until sin entered the world. Eating meat
was not
permissible prior to the Flood, just as murder was not permitted, but it is
likely both men and animals engaged in it anyway.
In fact, one of God’s reasons for sending a great flood to
destroy the world of Noah’s day is stated in Genesis 6:
“And God said to Noah, ‘I have determined to make an end of all flesh, for the earth is filled with violence through them.’ ”
“All flesh” presumably includes animals.
Agents and Automatons
The question that is often asked is why God would give
either man or animals the capability of digesting meat in Genesis 1 if the
world as God originally intended involved no death at all.
One answer is to remind ourselves that God often allows for
the possibility of something that is less than ideal. Indeed, the possibility
of doing things God never intended us to do and with which he is not pleased is
a necessary precondition to human freedom and the ability to choose good over
evil, and the difference between being agents or automatons.
If this were not the case, neither the tree of the knowledge
of good and evil nor the tree of life would have been planted in Eden.
Moreover, the introduction of laws to the world, whether at Sinai, before or
after it, demonstrates that God is committed to allowing the consequences of
choice to play out in the world even if those choices often produce pain and
suffering. Laws exist not only to show us the right way to go, but to deal with
the consequences of our actions when we have chosen the wrong path.
The End from the Beginning
A second answer is that God know the end from the beginning.
The fall of man was not something he desired, but scripture teaches it was a
possibility (inevitability?) for which he made provision in eternity. If, as the
apostle writes, the people of God were not merely created for his glory, but specifically
“chosen
in him [Christ] before the
foundation of the world”, then God took Adam’s failure of leadership into
account long before there was ever an Adam, and made provision to deal with the
spiritual needs of Adam’s children in the person of his Son.
And if God could make the greater provision for the redemption
of his creation in the person of Christ, it is not unreasonable to suppose that
he would also anticipate the physical needs of his creatures, both man and
animal, during the inevitable periods in history during which being able to
settle peacefully in one place long enough to grow grains, fruit and vegetables
for food was a luxury enjoyed by few.
In those times, the very useful ability to ingest and process large quantities
of protein, vitamins and calories in a single, very rare meal may have been
what kept many species of omnivores alive.
No comments :
Post a Comment