The most recent version of this post is available here.
- Home
- What We’re Doing Here
- F A Q
- 119
- Anonymous Asks
- Book Reviews
- The Commentariat Speaks
- Doesn’t Always Mean What We Think It Means
- Flyover Country
- How Not to Crash and Burn
- Inbox
- Just Church
- The Language of the Debate
- Mining the Minors
- No King in Israel
- On the Mount
- Quote of the Day
- Recommend-a-blog
- Semi-Random Musings
- That Wacky Old Testament
- Time and Chance
- What Does Your Proof Text Prove?
Monday, June 20, 2016
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Saturday, June 18, 2016
Why Do Christians Worship?
[NFL fans will not miss the obvious; this post was written well prior to the acquisition of Manning’s second (and final) Superbowl ring — Ed.]
Prior to the Superbowl, there was much discussion about Denver quarterback Peyton Manning.
Prior to the Superbowl, there was much discussion about Denver quarterback Peyton Manning.
Everybody seemed to want to know where Manning rates on the
list of all-time football greats. It was not a subject debated only by the
talking heads on TV. Jim Rome rambled on about it on my car radio. It came up
at work. It came up at my local diner. Even people who would otherwise be uninterested in football seemed to have an opinion about Manning’s legacy in
the two weeks between conference finals and the big game — and even more so
during the game itself.
It is in the nature of mankind to have something to say about
greatness.
Friday, June 17, 2016
Too Hot to Handle: Tom Becomes a Redhead
In which our regular writers toss around
subjects a little more volatile than usual.
At one end of the spectrum you get
Christians for whom everything is worship; hence terms like “worship team” and
“worship leader” and so on. Such a concept of worship is so broad as to be
almost meaningless. At the other end you have the ritualists, whether they are
Catholicized and liturgical or simply traditionalist evangelicals with very
rigid ideas about what a church’s corporate worship ought to entail. Such a view
of worship fails to deal adequately with Romans 12:1.
Both extremes claim scriptural evidence for
their positions, though I would argue that both views of worship are too limited. Everything in the Christian life may be done worship-fully, but choosing to worship remains a specific and deliberate act.
Labels:
Recycling
/
Too Hot to Handle
/
Worship
Thursday, June 16, 2016
Higher Learning
The martyrdom of John Lambert came up in discussion with my
fellow blogger IC last week. Lambert was burned at the stake in 1538 for refusing
to retract his objection to the doctrine of transubstantiation. As he died,
Lambert is reported to have cried out over and over again, “None but Christ!
None but Christ!”
Subsequent to our conversation, IC sent me a link to a video
clip of an episode from the otherwise-execrable TV series The Tudors, in which John Lambert meets
his end. Interestingly, the show’s producers opted to change Lambert’s dying
statement to “All for Christ! All for Christ!”
So what? Such minor tweaking of dialogue takes place all the
time in the process of bringing real stories to big and small screens alike. It’s
still a powerful scene, and the viewer’s sympathies are fully with Lambert,
which is presumably the writers’ intent.
Still, there is a difference in meaning, and I think it’s
one worth noting.
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Traitors at the Table
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Communion
/
Lord's Supper
/
Remembrance
/
Worship
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
In Need of Analysis: Worship as a Lifestyle [Part 2]
“God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.”
We have been discussing worship as a lifestyle, a concept
set out by John Piper among others, and how the recent discovery of a “worship lifestyle” compares with the way the word “worship” is actually employed throughout scripture.
First we drew a sharp distinction between two ways scripture uses the word: (1) to describe “acts of worship” (the public appearance) and (2) to refer to “worship” itself (the heart reality). Then we went on to establish that genuine worship is deliberate, sacrificial,
obedient and informed by the character of God himself. It is not a mechanical,
rote act, nor is it to be engaged in casually. It takes place at specific times, not at every moment of life.
Labels:
In Need of Analysis
/
John Piper
/
Recycling
/
Romans
/
Worship
Monday, June 13, 2016
In Need of Analysis: Worship as a Lifestyle [Part 1]
The subject of worship is currently getting a little more attention than usual in Christian circles, and that’s not a bad thing. We have John Piper to thank for this, among others who have written about worship as a lifestyle.
Piper starts by encouraging us to enlarge our thoughts of worship:
“… don’t think worship services when you think worship. That is a huge limitation which is not in the Bible. All of life is
supposed to be worship.”
and goes on to describe eating at Pizza Hut to the glory of
God, having sex to the glory of God and dying to the glory of God. So eating
moderately, healthily and gratefully is worship; loving sex within the bounds
of marriage is worship; chastity, too, is worship. “You are always in a
temple,” Piper says. “Always worship.”
Labels:
In Need of Analysis
/
John Piper
/
Recycling
/
Worship
/
Worship Teams
Sunday, June 12, 2016
Tom Takes a Breather (2)
Long-time readers will probably remember that we did this in June last year, and it was so much fun (for me at least) that this year we’re doing it again. You’re currently reading our 921st consecutive daily blog post since December 2013. (To be fair, a little over 6% of those posts were recycled, but if you don’t tell, I won’t.)
I’m going to take this coming week to recharge my batteries and work on a few pieces without an immediate deadline looming, but really that’s just a convenient excuse to do this:
Labels:
Coming Untrue
Saturday, June 11, 2016
Christianity Without Christ
If you missed the
goings-on in the streets of San Jose last week outside a rally for presidential
candidate Donald Trump,
you might have been the only one. Protesters waved Mexican flags and were
caught on camera burning Trump hats, egging, punching and kicking Trump
supporters and calling them “racists” and “fascists”. One police officer was
assaulted. Video clips on YouTube show victims almost uniformly white and attackers
almost uniformly Hispanic.
A minor skirmish,
really, but we’re only in June. It’s a long way to November, and there’s no
guarantee the election of a new president — no matter who he or she may be —
will do anything to substantially ease racial tensions.
Labels:
Diversity
/
Donald Trump
/
Galatians
/
Multiculturalism
/
Racism
Friday, June 10, 2016
Too Hot to Handle: Unpardon Me
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Blasphemy
/
Luke
/
Mark
/
Matthew
/
Too Hot to Handle
/
Unpardonable Sin
Thursday, June 09, 2016
A Tale of Two Speeches
Wait, I’m pretty sure I’ve used that opening line before.
Never mind. The point is that our good
friend RHE has a few words to say on the subject of a commencement speech she gave back in 2003 upon graduating from a conservative Christian university and what, if given another shot at the same
gig with proverbial 20/20 hindsight, she would say differently today.
Fair enough. I hope we’ve all learned
something in the last 13 years.
Labels:
Progressivism
/
Rachel Held Evans
/
Romans
Wednesday, June 08, 2016
Game Misconduct
Most hockey fans are familiar with it, though I suppose it
happens less in international play than in the NHL.
Hockey has two minute penalties, five minute penalties, compound penalties like “double minors” and a variety of other ways of maintaining order. But it is only the rarest and most egregious
offenses that call for ejection. The player who receives such a penalty is sent
straight to the dressing room.
Game over.
Game over.
It’s called a game misconduct, and something similar may
happen to Christians.
Labels:
1 John
/
Sin That Leads to Death
Tuesday, June 07, 2016
Paying Attention
God, to the prophet Balaam:
“You shall not curse the people, for they
are blessed.”
Now check out when this statement is made.
It’s at the tail end of almost 40 years of what must have seemed like
absolutely pointless wandering, basically filling in time. It’s made about a
people who had just spent years watching their parents and grandparents, uncles
and aunts die in the wilderness for their disobedience.
Blessed, huh?
Monday, June 06, 2016
Inbox: Sucking the Life Out of ‘Vampire Churches’
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Apostle Paul
/
Church
/
Inbox
/
Skye Jethani
Sunday, June 05, 2016
Lurking Sentimentalists Beware
At the risk of getting clobbered by the chronically sentimental,
I’d like to ask a few hard questions about a relatively recent trend within
evangelicalism. Baby dedications are now being offered as a service in churches
that claim to base their faith and practice solely on the principles and
instruction of the New Testament.
You know what I mean: special events at
which new parents “present” their baby and some designated individual asks them
on behalf of their church (in front of friends, family and brothers and sisters
in Christ) if they are willing to raise their child “in the nurture and
admonition of the Lord”, or something like it.
I find the logic baffling.
Labels:
Baby Dedication
/
Ceremony
/
Children
/
Christening
Saturday, June 04, 2016
Quote of the Day (22)
Yup, in Canada this is
just another pylon marking our national descent on the mad Gadarene slide:
“Canada’s House of Commons has passed the government's proposed assisted suicide law.
The House of Commons voted 186-137. The law still requires Senate approval.”
The House of Commons voted 186-137. The law still requires Senate approval.”
What’s that? You say the phrase doesn’t ring a bell?
Labels:
Malcolm Muggeridge
/
Quote of the Day
Friday, June 03, 2016
Too Hot to Handle: Faith in the Crosshairs
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Apologetics
/
Atheism
/
Faith
/
Too Hot to Handle
Thursday, June 02, 2016
“We Should Only Allow …”
I’m reading a twenty
year-old article on the subject of divorce written by a Christian whose
judgment and understanding of scripture I respect and whose personal conduct as
a believer is excellent.
So it’s hard to
explain why I feel a bit irked as I work my way through it. I think it has to
do with the phrase: “We should only allow …”
I wonder, who is “we”,
and what is the biblical mechanism by which we choose to “allow” or “not allow”
certain sorts of choices to be made by other believers?
Wednesday, June 01, 2016
Making Sure
People who don’t think a genuine believer
in Jesus Christ belongs irrevocably to him use a variety of verses to support their claim that it is possible to be saved and then lose
your salvation.
This isn’t a verse I’m used to seeing used
that way:
“Therefore, brothers, be all the more diligent to confirm your calling and election, for if you practice these qualities you will never fall.”
The usual suspects are full of catchy
expressions like “eternal sin”, “sin that leads to death” or even “impossible to restore them again to repentance”. Separate such phrases from their contexts and
it is possible to become quite confused and concerned about the permanence of salvation.
Labels:
2 Peter
/
Assurance of Salvation
/
Eternal Security
/
Faith
/
Works
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)