My father loved my
mother and vice versa. They were not perfect — nobody is — but they
consistently modeled their Christian faith for their children. As a result, I
and my siblings grew up conscious there was at least one worldview out there
that produced a positive real-life outcome for those who held it.
Some people think that’s
programming.
An older, unsaved
relative once suggested as much to my brother. Noting that most Christian
families have their “black sheep” story, he figured Mom and Dad deserved the Franz Anton Mesmer Award for exceptional zombification skills since all their children continue to
pursue Christ as adults. He truly could not imagine any other way such a feat
might have been accomplished.
Possibly. But it’s an
odd sort of programming that leaves its indoctrinees wandering, observing, reading
freely, exposing ourselves to all kinds of points of view and even indulging in
some of the less-useful practices prevalent in our society.
I did some traveling,
observing and experimenting during my teens and twenties in the hope of finding
a worldview and consequent lifestyle that would produce the same sort of desirable
experience I grew up with, only without so many dos
and don’ts involved. (At that age, how
Christians lived was more notable to me than the content of their faith. I didn’t
get serious about living for the Lord until I was almost 23.)
Different Experience, Same Outcome
My sister, on the
other hand, never struggled visibly with the same sorts of issues. She was a
model Christian daughter. Maybe the Mesmer business worked on her.
My brothers became
serious about being disciples of the Lord Jesus at different points in their
twenties under wildly different circumstances, each with at least as much life
experience as I had, though they had completely different issues to work
through to get there.
My relative’s
programming hypothesis fell down when he came to realize that each of my siblings is
able to defend his or her convictions intellectually and experientially, though the
cognitive process was different in each case, and our set of experiences were more
different still. The arguments we would make for Christianity and for Christ
are different again.
What he was observing
was not programming but persuasion.
The Demerits of Programming
Now I’m NOT saying
there are no examples out there of Christian parents brainwashing their
progeny. It definitely happens, and it’s ugly when it does. It’s also largely
ineffectual. Kids that are propagandized into their faith rather than arriving
at it personally and with full conviction find that it rarely sees them through
the first year of university.
At that point, they
have a choice: Either re-examine everything they ever thought they knew or
throw their faith on the scrap heap. I’ll let you guess which is the easier and
more common option.
Likewise, many among
the quasi-Christian cults do a great job of programming their acolytes. But get
them past their memorized proof texts and it is quickly evident they have
little spiritual acuity to bring to any discussion of the
Christian faith.
I’m also NOT saying that persuasion is an infallible tool. Some children simply will not be persuaded, even by the best of parents. We’ve all seen examples of that.
Whipping the Masses Into An Unthinking Mob
The Lord himself never
treated his audience like a herd of cattle to be driven in one direction or
another. He was not interested in displaying his rhetorical prowess by whipping
the masses into an unthinking mob, though this was surely the scenario most
feared by the Pharisees and other religious leaders. At times he even resisted
presenting truth too clearly. The parables were designed to engage the minds and hearts of the faithful while remaining
opaque to those by choice had become insensitive.
Likewise, we see him over
and over again engaging with individuals and attempting to persuade. Repeatedly
he debates with small groups of Pharisees and scribes criticizing or testing him. Then there is the Canaanite woman, the rich young man, the people in Mary and Martha’s home, Zacchaeus, Nicodemus and the woman of Samaria. Why bother to answer so many intelligent, individual questions, not to mention
meeting so many individual and personal needs, if the agenda was simply to
generate unthinking compliance?
Paul and the Mind
Finally, the apostle
Paul’s gospel methodology was as deferential to the individual intellect as his
Master’s. He used rational, evidentiary arguments to prove the resurrection. Characteristically, he would reason with Jews rather than simply pontificate. He tells the Corinthians:
“We destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ.”
There was no Franz Mesmer in Paul’s
missionary work. In every way he sought to engage the mind as well as the heart
and spirit.
I Have Stored Up Your Word
We teach children to memorize proof texts:
John 3:16, Romans 10:9, and so on. All good on one level:
“I have stored up your word in my heart,
that I might not sin against you.”
But when my father taught us to memorize
scripture, it was in blocks, not individual verses. I think he was on to
something there. I can still repeat James 1 in its entirety. And I have context
in my head for each of those very important verses. If you ask me to exposit
that chapter, I can sail right through it because I have become persuaded of
its truth rather than programmed to repeat parts of it at the appropriate moment.
If I had to choose, I would rather send to
university a Christian teen who can explain salvation in plain English in his
own words than one who can rattle off a thousand memorized proof texts.
Persuasion beats programming every time.
No comments :
Post a Comment