I think we’re all seeing that on TV right
about now. The conventional wisdom is that America is reduced to scrounging
for its least-worst presidential option, and the pickings are world-record slim.
This is not a new problem. In democratic
countries, politicians are stereotypically less credible than used car salesmen,
TV evangelists and the mainstream media.
People who want to run the show are often the
worst people to actually do it.
Makes me think it might be more prudent to
draft our leaders against their wishes rather than allowing them to volunteer.
The best and brightest have a tendency to be doing something more constructive
than self-promotion in the year and a half before any given election. Not only
that, most people who characteristically produce value in this world prefer to continue producing so long as any choice is given
them, as this parable told by Jotham son of Gideon to the leaders of Shechem
reminds us:
“The trees once went out to anoint a king over them, and they said to the olive tree, ‘Reign over us.’ But the olive tree said to them, ‘Shall I leave my abundance, by which gods and men are honored, and go hold sway over the trees?’And the trees said to the fig tree, ‘You come and reign over us.’ But the fig tree said to them, ‘Shall I leave my sweetness and my good fruit and go hold sway over the trees?’And the trees said to the vine, ‘You come and reign over us.’ But the vine said to them, ‘Shall I leave my wine that cheers God and men and go hold sway over the trees?’Then all the trees said to the bramble, ‘You come and reign over us.’ And the bramble said to the trees, ‘If in good faith you are anointing me king over you, then come and take refuge in my shade, but if not, let fire come out of the bramble and devour the cedars of Lebanon.’ ”
Well, perhaps “told” is the wrong word.
A Little Backstory
Actually, I suspect Jotham may have shouted his
parable, because he was standing on the top of nearby Mount Gerizim in what is
now the West Bank — the place where twelve curses had been pronounced by
the Levites when Israel first entered Canaan — and he was addressing
people in the valley below him. The setting was singularly appropriate; he
too had a curse to pronounce.
For Jotham, standing atop Gerizim was the
safest place to be. After all, the leaders of Shechem had just helped Jotham’s
half-brother Abimelech murder seventy of Jotham’s siblings one after another. Once
he had finished his parable and explained it, Jotham pronounced his own curse on
Abimelech and Shechem and promptly ran away.
The parable is an insult in that the trees
symbolize the leaders of Shechem and the bramble symbolizes Abimelech, who
turned out to be pretty worthless leader and ended up literally burning those he
had led, just as Jotham’s curse foretold.
Come and Take Refuge in My Shade
Now, the bramble is a thorny bush substantial enough to burn for cooking but not useful for much else, and bound to be an annoyance when clearing land
for settlement. The bramble’s line, “Come and take refuge in my shade” is
probably sarcasm.
Notwithstanding the fact that it was
entirely unsuited to be king of the trees, every other tree that was asked —
every one the least bit qualified, desirable or otherwise appealing — felt
they had better things to do.
So the bramble was the only game in town.
In some situations, being leaderless beats the
alternative.
Thanks, But I Gave at the Office
I have a feeling the leaders in some
churches, while hopefully not quite so bad as Abimelech, have assumed
responsibility under a similar scenario: because too many truly qualified men
have said ‘No, thanks’. I don’t imagine drafting elders is a realistic
option, but we need to remember that many of the best leaders in scripture seem
to have been those who were not out looking for the job of leading anybody:
Moses, Samuel, David, Ezra and Nehemiah all led from a sense of obligation to God and his people rather than a desire to be prominent. Great victories were
won in Israel by men like Gideon and Barak, who didn’t want the job.
Paul tells Timothy, “The saying is trustworthy: If anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task”.
Leading the people of God is, first and foremost, a task. It’s work. Most of it
is work you can do without the “office”.
In fact, the word “office” is not even there
in the Greek. That’s our overly-helpful ESV translation team acknowledging the
current state of church leadership and attempting to find some sort of English equivalent
people might understand. Their solution is inelegant, to say the least; it makes
overseeing the church of God sound like a prestigious elected position rather
than the hard labor it really is.
A Bit of an Oversight
In fact, the words “to the office of an overseer” in
English are all one word, episkopē, denoting an examination. It might be clearer in English and truer to the Greek
to simply say, “If anyone aspires to oversight”. Oversight is the aspect of the
elder’s job that involves seeing the people of God as they are; being
clearheaded, perceptive and intelligently aware of their needs and the dangers
to them. You can’t shepherd the sheep if you can’t see them and their
environment clearly. Overseers must “pay careful attention”, as Paul told the elders in Ephesus.
It ain’t an office, folks. There’s little obvious
prestige (though there should be),
no regular pay, no cushy earthly retirement plan and not a lot of ceremony. Just hard work, much
of which is near-invisible to onlookers, and most of which can be done without
any sort of acknowledged “office” at all: Bible teaching, formal and informal;
counseling; hospitality; prayer; visiting the sick and needy; giving advice;
encouraging; motivating and leading by example. Nobody needs certification for
any of that.
And Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton would
be spectacularly uninterested in the job.
Squeezing the Olive Tree
So, if your church needs leadership, look
for men who are already doing that sort of work without being asked, and ask
them to consider doing it a little more recognizably alongside others with the
same desire to serve. Squeeze the olive tree a little harder. Tell the fig tree
the sweetness of his fruit is better shared. Tell the vine there are more hearts
to be cheered than he is currently reaching.
Point these men out to others if you have
to. Draw attention to their good works. Then if you must take no for an answer,
don’t take it easily.
Now, if your church hasn’t got any men like
that, that’s a different problem entirely; one that calls for serious consideration,
public discussion and prayer.
Leaving Your Abundance
And if by chance you happen to be a man like this, doing the
work of an overseer but saying no to any sort of formal recognition for one
reason or another, take a moment and reconsider your position. If you feel you’re
unworthy of the job, well, good. Excellent, even. In some ways you probably
are. If you felt totally worthy of the job, you’d be Hillary Clinton, or maybe
the bramble in the parable. Do you really want to go there?
But if your fellow believers are convinced
you have the scriptural qualifications and you’re already doing much of the work
out of love already, what’s to lose? Unless, like the olive tree, you’d rather
not “leave your abundance”.
I hope not. The job is worth the risk: the personal, financial, emotional risk.
And if you don’t step up, bear in mind that somebody eventually will — somebody
who probably sees the job very differently than you do, who craves visibility more
than service, is prickly and painful to deal with and is happy to offer your church shade he hasn’t got.
That somebody may burn your church badly.
Either way, churches shouldn’t settle for
brambles. Nobody needs THAT sort of leadership.
Do you think the Scripture ever envisages a local church without any shepherds? I'm thinking of men gifted by the Spirit of God for that function.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting question, Patrick. Hmm.
DeleteThe church in Antioch (Acts 13:1) was said to have "prophets and teachers". I find it notable that the words "shepherd" and "elder" are not used if such were already being recognized in the churches at that time. It would have been natural for the Holy Spirit to say so, I'd think. But we don't find elders being pointed out until the end of chapter 14.
Yet Antioch still functioned effectively enough to send out the first missionaries. (My suspicion is that church already had gifted men doing the work of elders, whether or not they were recognized.)
I have certainly been in small local churches that would appear to have no genuine shepherds. I bet you have too. I can only think that their prospects are hardly ideal, and yet I would be quite reluctant to tell them "You're not a church" because they lack biblical leadership.
I'm curious now: what are your thoughts about this?