![]() |
Perception can be fantasyland |
The line has been
attributed to eighties political strategist Lee Atwater. I dislike it
thoroughly: communication is tough enough without deliberately eroding the
meaning of words. Our general failure to apply our critical faculties to aphorisms
like Atwater’s simply accelerates the disintegration of language into
meaningless babble.
I’m not kidding. Hey, we’re talking about the nature of reality here.
Objectivity and Sensation
“Reality” is one of
those few precious English words that describes the state of things as they actually exist, independent of
human perception. “Truth” is another, “fact” and “data” come pretty close, and “genuine”
or “real” are also useful. There are not many of these words, and we need to
retain them in our language if we are to even attempt to describe the actual state
of the universe in which we live. Objectivity is important because things like
science (and therefore civilization) require it. Real, lasting relationships
require it. Our spiritual lives require it.
What bugs me about
Atwater’s line is that it dumps accuracy in favor of being short and memorable. You see, when
Atwater said “Perception is reality,” what he meant that our senses create OUR inner “reality” or worldview. Our beliefs come from the input we receive via nature.
I don’t
disagree with Atwater’s idea, but I hate that he has incorrectly used the word “reality”
to describe what is (in reality!) nothing more than perception. Atwater spoke
of “your reality” and “my reality” as if they could possibly be different from
one another, just like the addled hippies of my youth spoke of “your truth” or “my truth”.
Utter nonsense. Post-modernist tripe. Reality is reality, period. 2 + 2 is always 4.
So, in fact, Atwater’s
too-clever-by-half not-quite-truism actually boils down to “Perception is
perception”, which is what we call a tautology: he’s simply repeating the same
thing in different words, and in this case the second word is being badly abused.
Maintaining a Grasp
Now admittedly,
maintaining one’s objectivity is not an easy discipline. Perhaps for human
beings it is impossible to sustain for any significant period. Our senses constantly
interfere with it. As the skeptical Ebenezer Scrooge famously said to the ghost
of Jacob Marley:
“You may be an undigested bit of beef, a blot of mustard, a crumb of cheese, a fragment of underdone potato. There’s more of gravy than of grave about you.”
But the rational reader recognizes that
regardless of Scrooge’s perceptions and their origin, Marley’s ghost was either
in his bedroom or else he wasn’t. Either he was a genuine manifestation of spiritual
reality sent by Heaven to change Scrooge’s miserable life, or else he was
a mere hallucination: a crumb of cheese. I don’t think Dickens tells us, and from
a storytelling perspective it hardly matters. It definitely doesn’t matter to
the Cratchitt family and especially not to Tiny Tim, who ends up the most
significant beneficiary of Scrooge’s moral transformation.
That said, it certainly matters to us
real-life “Scrooges” whether our moral acts originate in truth or lies; in the
state of our digestion or in our dealings with God in Jesus Christ. It will
absolutely matter at the judgment.
Reality matters, not just our personal
impression of it. Ask the guy who thought he had a good marriage about the
value of his perceptions five minutes after his wife throws his belongings
on the front lawn. I may self-identify as a rainbow unicorn if I wish, but that does not make it so.
Living in the Real World
Scripture encourages us as much as possible
to live in the real world, not in our own private La La land, however
pleasurable that may be:
“For by the grace given to me I say to everyone among you not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think, but to think with sober judgment, each according to the measure of faith that God has assigned.”
Thus, Paul says, the believer is to be
realistic about who he is and how he is to function within the Body of Christ.
He or she is to be a sober thinker, not a fantasist.
I might imagine myself to be a wonderful public
speaker, full of original thoughts and deep spiritual insights, but nothing
could be more irrelevant than my subjective opinion of my own skill set. If I
want to serve as a teacher among God’s people, I need more objective data.
Specifically, I need to know whether I am edifying the people of God when I
exercise what I think is my spiritual gift. That means I must listen to my wife
when we’re driving home and take her criticisms seriously. It means I must listen
to my elders if they tell me my grasp of doctrine is shaky or that there are a
few verses in James I really ought to consider more carefully. When someone
shaking my hand at the door tells me they had no idea what I was talking about,
I need to give serious consideration to the possibility that the problem wasn’t
his intellectual laziness but my failure to communicate effectively.
Most importantly, I need to constantly
weigh what I am saying from the platform against the words of scripture
themselves to see if I am somehow misrepresenting the truth of God.
Dead Wrong or Sober Judgment
Now of course the opinions of others can be
wrong. Or they may lie to us to make us feel good or because they hate
confrontation. I may be the greatest Bible teacher in the world, and all those
negative feedback “data points” may be dead wrong. But the greater the amount
of independent testimony I accumulate, the more likely I am to get an accurate
picture of my abilities and the more likely it is that the Lord can speak to me to address
those areas of my interaction with my fellow believers that need tweaking or
even a major overhaul.
Frankly, if I don’t do these things, it is
unlikely that I am thinking of myself with sober judgment. Or to put it another
way, my perception is NOT reality.
No comments :
Post a Comment