“Do illegitimate children go to heaven?”
A child is called illegitimate when born to a woman not legally
married to the father. He or she may be the product of any of a variety of
circumstances: a one night stand, a brief, broken or casual ongoing sexual relationship,
prostitution, adultery or even incest. Artificial insemination has also made it
possible for a woman to bring a child into the world without committing to a
relationship with the donor, and this option is becoming increasingly popular
in some demographics.
Some illegitimate children are raised by the state in
institutions and foster homes. Some are raised by grandparents or other
relatives. Some are adopted. The majority are raised by single mothers.
Despite the omnitolerance of modern society, most illegitimate
children still experience tremendous disadvantages in life. The available statistical
evidence shows children raised by single mothers have a better than average
chance of being impoverished, mentally ill, drug or alcohol abusive, suicidal,
poor in school, pregnant in their teens and/or disposed to criminality. You can
probably add to that data no small amount of anecdotal evidence from personal
observation; I know I can.
So are we going to add to that list of miseries a God who
packs illegitimate children off to hell for the sins of their parents?
I sure hope not.
The Utility of Social Stigma
Historically, illegitimacy has carried with it a fair bit of
social stigma, greater in some societies than others. Much of this “shaming”
was actually well-intended, even if it seems unkind to us today: when society
incentivizes an activity — sexual promiscuity, for example — we
invariably see more of it. This may be demonstrated easily enough by comparing our
own increasingly permissive generation, with its illegitimacy
rate of 40.7%, against the 1940 U.S. illegitimacy rate of slightly
under 3%. It seemed unwise to our ancestors to encourage the casual
production of children from relationships where they would get inferior (or
non-existent) parenting, most of whom would go on to become the burden of
society. Who can blame them for that? This seems unfair to the illegitimate
child, who had no say in how he came into the world, but it kept the numbers of
children born out of wedlock from precipitating an economic crisis and social
disaster.
So then, if single motherhood is indeed the dyscivic institution
the statistics suggest, then the social stigma historically associated with
illegitimacy, unpleasant as it seems to us now, actually served a useful
purpose.
A Little Religious History
In Western societies, Roman Catholicism reinforced the
stereotype of the illegitimate child as afflicted by a “defect of birth”, and
barred bastards from the priesthood, the diaconate and from religious orders,
apart from special dispensation. A child born out of wedlock was believed to be
tainted by the depravity of its parents.
Some of the extreme social and ecclesiastical reservation
about illegitimacy is indeed derived from the teaching of the Bible. The Law of
Moses forbade children
of a forbidden union from entering the “assembly of the Lord” even to the
tenth generation. This did not mean an illegitimate child could not live and
move among his own people; but it did restrict
him from participating fully in Israelite communal life — which is to
say the nation’s religious, legal and military affairs. An illegitimate child
was a second-class citizen in Israel, with a fixed ceiling on how far he could
rise in society.
Bugs and Features
Again, there is a certain inescapable logic to this: children
raised in unstable circumstances were less likely to be inculcated with good
moral values and civic priorities, and on average cost ancient societies more
than they benefited them. The prohibition in the Law of Moses had the effect of
discouraging adults from engaging in sexual behaviors that would put their
offspring at a permanent social disadvantage. This was a feature, not a bug,
and it was especially critical in a society where the only consistently efficient
birth control method was abstinence, and abortions were so inconvenient and dangerous
that most of the “byproducts” of sexual immorality made it into the world.
So then, the Old Testament says a great deal about sexual
immorality but very little about illegitimate children. God’s primary concern appears
to have been that Israelite adults not behave like the nations around them and
thereby create disasters for their families and for society.
Going to Heaven
How does this all relate to question of whether illegitimate
children go to heaven? Well, in Catholic theology, unbaptized
persons go to limbo rather than to heaven. While most Catholic sources say
they have always been willing to baptize illegitimate children, it should be
obvious that the frequency of child baptism would have been significantly lower in
cases where the child’s mother felt unwelcomed by the church. In largely
Catholic societies, this association of the “unbaptized” state with
illegitimacy may have given rise to the myth that illegitimate children are
barred from heaven.
There is no truth to this. The New Testament consistently
teaches that an eternal family relationship with God is available to anyone who
wants it simply by confessing
Jesus Christ as Lord and believing that God raised him from the dead, and in
no other way. Nothing bars or forbids an illegitimate child from expressing
faith in Christ, and Jesus himself said, “Whoever
comes to me I will never cast out.” Heaven is the glorious destination
of everyone who dies in Christ without exception, regardless of the circumstances
of his or her birth.
For that matter, there is at least one instance in which Jesus
himself may have been accused of being illegitimate, though that
interpretation is often disputed. If so, to the extent that there is still a social
stigma or disadvantage to an accusation of illegitimacy, then the Lord Jesus
surely understands exactly what that feels like.
I am not sure it was even worth writing an entire blog along the lines of this topic since these questions can be resolved in a much quicker and easier and more natural fashion. You can do that by simply asking yourself a few questions. First, have you ever met an unbaptized person or do you think an unbaptized person that you would meet is not someone who you could consider as a friend or friendly acquaintance? I assume most normal persons would not have an issue relating to an unbaptized person. So how would the idea even come about that you may be superior to God because he would shy away from such a person and deny his friendship? Obviously that is nonsense. So, unless you want to spin the most convoluted, incorrect and uncharitable assumptions the answer is clear, God is probably just a little better and more charitable than you are and has no problem with such a person.
ReplyDelete