Not all friendships get off on the right foot.
One of my best buddies in high school was a skinny longhair
with similar tastes in pop music. But Terry and I met under less than
ideal circumstances. Another student had a serious grudge against me and was
determined to make my early high school life as miserable as possible; however,
he wasn’t quite sure he had it in him to handle a six foot 200 pounder
on his own. So, one day after school, he and his hulking sidekick chased
me into the nearby woods. On the way, they drafted Terry to help out.
We crashed through the underbrush for what seemed like miles,
but was really only hundreds of yards. Tiring quickly, and desperate to avoid
having to fight on three sides at once, I found my way into the
thickest part of the forest where it was impossible for more than one of them to
come at me at any given time.
So who got sent into the bush after me? Terry, of course.
Huffing and Puffing
Out of sight of the others, Terry whispered that he had
nothing against me and didn’t really want to fight. So we took turns huffing,
puffing, groaning, shouting and hitting the surrounding trees with broken branches
for a few minutes, scratched ourselves up a bit, and muddied up my jacket. After
a while the whole deception started to get funny, and we were stifling our
laughter by the time Terry emerged looking the worse for wear to find that the
other two had gotten bored and had decided to go make trouble elsewhere.
Terry and I went back to his place to listen to music, and
I went home a few hours later with a bunch of his eight track tapes,
which tells you how long ago this was.
But, yeah, not all friendships start off on the right foot.
Israel and Judah
The history of Israel and Judah is a fascinating study. David, Israel’s second
king, was from the more dominant, numerous and historically significant tribe
of Judah, while Israel’s first king, Saul, had hailed from the
comparatively tiny tribe of Benjamin.
What Benjamin lacked in size it certainly made up in pugnacity. “Benjamin is a
ravenous wolf”, prophesied the original Benjamin’s dad, and so it
came to be. Benjamin the tribe was also inordinately insular and clannish,
willing to defend its own even when its own were dead wrong. In the time of the
judges all Israel went
to war against Benjamin to the point of near-annihilation, a
tragedy that could easily have been prevented with a few concessions or some
judicious politicking on Benjamin’s part. That wasn’t about to happen. Good
fighters, but a truculent bunch.
Grudge-Bearing and Rebellion
Benjamites
also had a near-insatiable capacity for grudge-bearing and rebellion. Having
once had the headship of the nation, the tribe of Benjamin seemed entirely
unable to concede that it was God’s righteous judgment that had stripped not
just Saul but Benjamin of the kingdom and all the perks that went with it. And
there were perks for the entire tribe: when Saul needed an
army commander, he naturally
chose a Benjamite and a family member. He probably did the same sort
of thing for other relatives.
But it was God who had passed final judgment on the
original Benjamite leadership of Israel, not David. And it was the Philistines
who killed Saul and most of his sons, not David. David did everything he could to preserve Saul’s family — quite the
counterintuitive move in a day when it was de rigueur to
consolidate one’s grip on the throne by wiping out the bloodline of every conceivable
challenger.
He got
no thanks for that. For the tribe of Benjamin, it was a whole lot easier to
blame David and to look for every opportunity to undermine him.
Bloodshed and Division
So
then, while David was being anointed king in Judah, the Benjamite commander of
Saul’s army was proclaiming
Saul’s remaining son king over the rest of Israel. Division and
bloodshed resulted. Interestingly, though Abner made Ish-bosheth king over “all
Israel”, it was primarily Benjamites who fought to establish Ish-bosheth’s kingdom.
This unjustified sense of Benjamite entitlement persisted throughout David’s reign,
even after he was finally able to consolidate the kingdom. When opening the
unification negotiations with David, Abner boldly asked him, “To whom does the
land belong?” Evidently he thought it still belonged to him and to
his tribe.
Then, when David fled Jerusalem in Absalom’s
insurrection, who was the first to heap fuel on the fire? Of course it was a Benjamite,
a fellow named Shimei, the son of Gera. He
threw stones at David and cursed, “Get out, get out, you man of blood, you
worthless man!” Years of wise and effective leadership from David had not
sated Benjamin’s misplaced hatred. At the first opportunity, the Benjamite
grudge reared its ugly head.
Rebellion and Recriminations
Immediately Absalom’s rebellion was put down, yet
another rebellion arose. And guess who was behind it? Right. That would be “a
worthless man, whose name was Sheba, the son of Bichri, a Benjamite”.
This particular rebellion was put down near-bloodlessly, but only because a
wise woman from the tribe of Naphtali brokered a peace arrangement in which
only rebellious Sheba lost his life.
Finally, Psalm 7 records David going through an
agony of self-examination before God. At this point it should hardly surprise
us to find that it is verbal abuse from “Cush, a Benjamite”
that prompts these recriminations. David stands accused of repaying his friends
with evil and plundering his enemy without cause, something of which he
believes he is not guilty.
So then, when David’s kingdom struggled internally and
when David struggled personally, it was almost always Benjamites who were to
blame.
Missing the Point
This back-and-forth rivalry between Judah and Benjamin
and the bloodshed to which it led are features of the books of Samuel entirely
obvious to attentive readers. I was not among their number, having missed
the major theme of tribal politics probably the first ten times
I read through these great books of history. I was caught up in the
more personal elements of the story, and predisposed from years of exposure to Sunday
school curriculum and “relevant” youth group studies to look for the
application to my own life rather than at the broader messages of the Old
Testament. It took repeated readings for some of the books’ more subtle lessons
to drop.
All well and good, you say, but where’s the ironic ending?
Well, after eighty years or so under the house of David and the
tribe of Judah, ten tribes saw fit to abandon the worthy project of a
united Israelite kingdom and reject the rule of the Davidic line. So the people
of Israel told David’s grandson, “What portion do we have in David? We
have no inheritance in the son of Jesse. To your tents, O Israel!
Look now to your own house, David.” And Israel went to their tents, says the
writer of the book of Kings.
Here Comes the Irony
So now here comes the irony. Guess which tribe it was out of
all Israel that stayed aligned with Judah? You’ve got it: Benjamin,
who had been a thorn in Judah’s side for more than forty years out of that
period. Parts of other tribes, and individuals discontented with Jeroboam’s
abandonment of temple worship and the moral values of the Davidic and Solomonic
kingdoms would later join them, but Benjamin was the only tribe to stick with
Judah from the very start, the only tribe to remain loyal to the house of
David. Benjamin would remain part of the kingdom (and later the nation) of Judah right up until the destruction
of Jerusalem in AD70.
Isn’t that fascinating? The peculiarities of human nature
and group dynamics are endlessly mysterious to me. I am admittedly reading
between the lines here, but I can only conclude that David’s repeated acts of generosity, forgiveness and fairness toward the tribe of Benjamin, and
his steadfast refusal to return evil for evil, eventually broke down their
natural antipathy toward David and Judah, and produced in them an unconditional
loyalty to the house of David. Solomon would learn this lesson from his father,
writing “A
soft tongue will break a bone” and “A
soft answer turns away wrath”, both of which thoughts anticipate the
teaching of the New Testament writers about personal relations, and that
of the Lord himself.
Lessons for the People of God
But it also suggests some other things about our own
interpersonal battles with our brothers in Christ today which may be worth
remembering:
- Not all good relationships start well.
- A bad relationship doesn’t have to be bad forever.
- Conflict often helps us discover other people’s good points if we are open to seeing them.
- An enemy truly converted is the most loyal of friends.
Not bad lessons to learn when dealing with the people of God
today, who are really not terribly different from the people of God in any other era.
No comments :
Post a Comment