The most recent version of this post is available here.
- Home
- What We’re Doing Here
- F A Q
- 119
- Anonymous Asks
- Book Reviews
- The Commentariat Speaks
- Doesn’t Always Mean What We Think It Means
- Flyover Country
- How Not to Crash and Burn
- Inbox
- Just Church
- The Language of the Debate
- Mining the Minors
- No King in Israel
- On the Mount
- Quote of the Day
- Recommend-a-blog
- Semi-Random Musings
- That Wacky Old Testament
- Time and Chance
- What Does Your Proof Text Prove?
Friday, May 30, 2014
Thursday, May 29, 2014
Quite Contrary: Scripture and Mariolotry
I’m all for consistency. Consistency is a great thing. I
imagine it’s comforting to view one’s faith as part of a grand ecclesiastical
tradition going back a couple thousand years. I suspect it’s reassuring to be
able to trace its leadership all the way back to Christ’s disciples. And if
there’s strength in numbers, how intimidating is a religious tradition that goes
by the name “universal”?
In any accusation against Roman Catholicism, the nagging question How can this many people over this many
years be wrong? seems an implicit rebuttal. And even
if the concept of infallibility is considered a bit much to ascribe to any
human institution, its historical dominance and sheer, massive scale suggest
that something in the order of “extremely likely to be correct” must
surely apply.
In comparison with Protestant factionalism, Catholicism
boasts an enviable appearance of solidarity. However, there are numerous and
visible cracks in the facade. For every unifying and stirring address from the
Pope there are thousands of practical departures from monolithic consistency at
the local, practical level — far away from Vatican City, where most Catholics
actually live. After all, before 1870, belief in papal infallibility was not a
defined requirement of Catholic faith. And in a 20-year old survey of 15-25
year olds, 81% Catholic, taken over a four-year period, only 36% affirmed that
the Pope has the authority to speak with infallibility.
So, cracks in the facade. There are many more. Still, it may
seem a little brazen to suggest that so many wise men with so much accrued
learning over so many centuries could be so wrong about so much. At least, it
would be brazen if the revelation of God began and ended with Romanism.
But it didn’t.
Labels:
Apostle Paul
/
Catholicism
/
Mariolotry
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
God’s Sovereignty vs. Suffering
There is very little more disorienting and disturbing than a
sudden change of circumstances for the worse. Even those who have studied and
enjoyed the word of God for years can be knocked off their pins by tragedy.
I remember reading C.S. Lewis’ book A Grief Observed as a very young believer and thinking that for a
mature Christian, he sure didn’t seem to handle loss very well.
Yeah, right.
A few years went by. A few things went wrong. I discovered
what real pain feels like.
Labels:
Affliction
/
Apostle Paul
/
David
/
Sovereignty
/
Suffering
Sunday, May 25, 2014
Mysticism and Salvation
I am about as far from a mystic as anyone I’ve ever met.
I lack the sort of conversion story other
believers often point to; the type of testimony that includes phrases like “I
asked God …” and “I felt a strange sense of peace come over me”; the type of
experience that leads you to write a date in the front of your Bible and
remember it the rest of your life. All I have is a vague recollection of an
emotional moment as a child on a front porch somewhere and the dawning realization
that Jesus died for me, but memory is malleable and inaccurate more often than
not.
So, like I do with everything else, I check boxes: “If you
confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord” [check], and “believe in your heart
that God raised him from the dead” [check], “you will be saved” [check and double-check].
That’s the word of God, and it gives me more confidence than
the recollection of any experience or feeling.
Immanuel Can sums it up perfectly in this recent post: “So
how can we know? The Father
loves the Son. Surprisingly, this is the essential answer we have been looking
for.”
No experience can be more reassuring than that. So,
mysticism, yeah … not really my thing.
Labels:
Conversion
/
Deus Pro Nobis
/
Faith
/
John C. Wright
/
Mysticism
/
Rationalism
/
Salvation
Saturday, May 24, 2014
Present Perfect
The most current version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Apostle Paul
/
Christ
/
Law
/
Salvation
Friday, May 23, 2014
God’s Sovereignty vs. Hardened Hearts
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Egypt
/
Israel
/
Moses
/
Pharaoh
/
Sovereignty
Thursday, May 22, 2014
Irrationalization: Call No Man Father
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Catholicism
/
Christ
/
Father
/
Religious Titles
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
Eden: Take This Job and Love It
We’ve been considering some of the things we can see about the character of God as they appear for us in a pre-sin moment in Eden. Eden uniquely provides an unhindered look into the relationship God wants between Himself and His creation.
First, we considered that God is shown in Eden to be primarily a God of unfettered fellowship; that He desired to share knowledge of Himself with humanity and that humanity was unashamed in the full presence of their Creator.
Second, we considered that God revealed Himself in the first moments of time to be a God who loves to bless and wants to be known as a rewarder of those who seek Him.
The third thing of note then is this. Adam and Eve had something you and I crave: They had worthwhile work.
First, we considered that God is shown in Eden to be primarily a God of unfettered fellowship; that He desired to share knowledge of Himself with humanity and that humanity was unashamed in the full presence of their Creator.
Second, we considered that God revealed Himself in the first moments of time to be a God who loves to bless and wants to be known as a rewarder of those who seek Him.
The third thing of note then is this. Adam and Eve had something you and I crave: They had worthwhile work.
Rather foolishly, when I have been having a tough day on the job and finding my efforts unsuccessful, I have wistfully said to someone who was listening — and ideally there wasn’t anybody listening — “Well, you know, work is a curse”.
But I was wrong then and you’d be wrong to think it now. Work isn’t a curse.
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
God’s Sovereignty vs. the Evil That Men Do
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Joseph
/
Sovereignty
Monday, May 19, 2014
Eden: Beginning of the Family Line
We’ve touched on the fact that God’s character is more clearly seen in the Eden story in Genesis than anywhere else in the Bible with the exception of Calvary. In Genesis 1, we read that God created male and female. Immediately following, we ask this: what is the very first thing they experience that Scripture records immediately following?
It’s there in the first line of verse 28. He blessed them. God blessed them.
The initial experience mankind had of the creator God was that He is and was by nature foremost to be known as a God who blesses. The highest priority he had for us, there in moment one, was blessing — and for us to come to know Him as a blesser.
The New Testament puts the same priority on it: “He who comes to God must believe that he is” — that makes good sense — “and that he is a rewarder” — that he is a blesser — “of those who seek Him”.
God wants to be known as a blesser, and here he blesses man and woman first.
In what way did He bless them? It’s manifold, of course — the blessing of life, the blessing of companionship with each other and fellowship with Him, the blessing of the surrounding beauty of creation and so on and so forth. But it’s interesting also to note not what all the implied blessings of Eden were but rather what the first expressed blessing of Eden was. The first recorded blessing is … what?
Children.
Sunday, May 18, 2014
Saints and Ain’ts
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Neo-Calvinism
/
Perseverance of the Saints
/
TULIP
Saturday, May 17, 2014
God’s Sovereignty vs. the Idiocy of Man
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Abraham
/
Isaac
/
Sovereignty
Friday, May 16, 2014
Mean Girls and Mean Theology
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Irresistible Grace
/
Neo-Calvinism
/
TULIP
Thursday, May 15, 2014
Two Men and You
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Adam
/
Christ
/
Colin Anderson
/
Head
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
Islam, Christianity and Secularism
Interesting things on TV these days.
If you missed it, which I certainly did, in this YouTube clip from last Friday’s show, Bill Maher — surprisingly, for such a notorious
secularist — connects the actions of Boko Haram (the Nigerian schoolgirl
abductors, for anyone not watching the news) to Islam “at large”, stating
plainly that “It’s not just a few bad apples”, much to the consternation of fellow
leftist Ariana Huffington, who begs to differ.
Matt Welch, Editor-in-Chief of Reason Magazine agrees with Maher (with a considerable number of qualifications):
“Islam is providing a disproportionate share of radical nutbags killing people
right now.”
Baratunde Thurston, CEO of Cultivated Wit and author of How To Be Black, dislikes Maher’s assessment and disagrees with Welch’s about the “disproportionate share”: “I don’t think Islam has any monopoly on
darkness and nutbags and crazy rhetoric and violence.”
Maher replies: “It’s not a monopoly, but it’s the Titanic
hitting the iceberg compared to Whitney Houston dying in her bathtub.”
Ouch.
Labels:
Ariana Huffington
/
Bill Maher
/
Boko Haram
/
Islam
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
Hooray for the Hypocrites
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
David Platt
/
Limited Atonement
/
Neo-Calvinism
/
TULIP
Monday, May 12, 2014
Do Christians Hate Jews?
Many Jews today feel that, because of historical atrocities committed against
their people by the so-called “Christian” church, all Christians are
Jew-haters. Unfortunately, not only many nominal Christians but even some real
believers harbor anti-Semitic attitudes, and this only confirms the suspicion
in Jewish minds.
But does the New Testament allow Christians to be prejudiced
in this way?
Definitely not.
Labels:
Israel
/
Jews
/
Judaism
/
Peter
/
Revelation
Sunday, May 11, 2014
Feeding the Dogs [Part 2]
Do you ever feel like God isn’t listening? That’s what this
woman had to deal with:
“Jesus … withdrew to the district of Tyre and Sidon. And behold, a Canaanite woman from that region came out and was crying, “Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of David; my daughter is severely oppressed by a demon.” But he did not answer her a word. And his disciples came and begged him, saying, “Send her away, for she is crying out after us.” He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 15:21-24)
In my previous post, I wondered how the Lord’s delay in
responding to the woman’s need — or even acknowledging her — was consistent with
his character, and how it served the purposes of God.
I wondered: If the Lord responds to the woman immediately
and grants her request, what’s the difference? What exactly is lost?
So I tried to point out yesterday that we lose an important
lesson about the priority of the Father’s will.
But we lose a couple of other things, I think.
Saturday, May 10, 2014
Feeding the Dogs [Part 1]
Picture yourself in a situation of dire need. Say you’re in
a private clinic with a sick child, a child that has been ailing badly for
weeks and months. In this scenario, there is no Obamacare, no National Health,
no social insurance program, and you are without resources, which is why you’ve
waited so long to come to a doctor. You can’t pay, and you know it. Hospitals
are for the rich.
So you cared for your child yourself as best you could. You
tried home remedies. You bought what drugs you could afford. You called on any
of your neighbours who knew a little bit about medicine, but nothing could be
done. You have exhausted every possibility you could think of. Nothing worked.
So even though you know you can’t pay, you go to the clinic.
You sit in the waiting room and watch as other parents leave with healthy
children and smiles on their faces. You know that whatever this doctor is
doing, it works. You see him down the hallway, treating other patients, but no
matter how you beg the receptionist, she keeps looking past you and calling out
“Next!” to the rich people behind you in line.
Finally, you step out of line and right up to the
kind-looking doctor. Against all your natural instincts, with no dignity left
in the world, you begin to beg.
He looks at you with concern and compassion in his eyes and
says … nothing. Nothing at all. Not a syllable.
How would you feel? What do you do next?
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)