The most recent version of this post is available here.
“If you’re tempted to think God might be speaking to you, he isn’t. When God speaks, you can’t miss it.” — Greg Koukl
- Home
- What We’re Doing Here
- F A Q
- 119
- Anonymous Asks
- Book Reviews
- The Commentariat Speaks
- Doesn’t Always Mean What We Think It Means
- Flyover Country
- How Not to Crash and Burn
- Inbox
- Just Church
- The Language of the Debate
- Mining the Minors
- No King in Israel
- On the Mount
- Quote of the Day
- Recommend-a-blog
- Semi-Random Musings
- That Wacky Old Testament
- Time and Chance
- What Does Your Proof Text Prove?
Thursday, December 12, 2019
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Bring on the Philistines
“Then all the tribes of Israel came to David at Hebron and said,
‘Behold, we are your bone and flesh. In times past, when Saul was king over
us, it was you who led out and brought in Israel. And the Lord said
to you, “You shall be shepherd of my people Israel, and you shall be
prince over Israel.” ’ ”
A little Bible history may remind us what a mealy-mouthed,
disingenuous endorsement this really is. At this point, David has been ruling as king over
Judah in Hebron for a full 7-1/2 years, while the tribes of Israel now
buttering him up have been engaged in bitter civil war against him, with
Ish-bosheth son of Saul as their chosen king and the tribe of Benjamin as the
power behind the throne.
Unfortunately both Ish-bosheth and his powerful and popular
general Abner are now dead. They won’t be governing anyone or delivering them
from their enemies.
Labels:
Body of Christ
/
Church
/
Identity
/
Israel
Tuesday, December 10, 2019
Women in the Old Testament
If you have never studied history in any serious depth, you
might be forgiven for thinking that some of things that went on ancient
Israelite households were absolutely barbaric, that wives and daughters were
horribly oppressed, lacked agency, were regarded as mere chattel, and lived
lives of virtual slavery.
Careful attention to the text of the Old Testament shows
this was rarely the case.
Labels:
1 Samuel
/
2 Samuel
/
Judges
/
Women's Role
Monday, December 09, 2019
Anonymous Asks (70)
“Does God love everyone?”
The answer to this
question may initially seem so obvious as to render further commentary a bit
pointless. If there is a better-known Bible verse than John 3:16,
I cannot think what it might be. Maybe a line from Psalm 23.
In any case, as the Lord told Nicodemus, “God so loved the world.”
There you are. God loves everyone. Full stop.
Or does he? And if he does, in what sense does he love everyone, and what does that mean for the
objects of his love?
Labels:
Anonymous Asks
/
God
/
Hate
/
Love
Sunday, December 08, 2019
The Other Side of the Story
One thing you will likely notice as you read through the Bible’s
books of history is that they are not saturated with editorial comments. That
is to say the Holy Spirit did not prompt the writers of scripture’s various
histories to pass moral judgment on many, even most, of the events they
recounted.
There are several notable instances in which he did.
Saturday, December 07, 2019
Time and Chance (13)
What distinguishes man from other mammals?
Charles Darwin famously argued that the difference in mind between mankind and the higher animals
is one of degree and not of kind. In other words, we have all the same basic intellectual material to work with.
Humans just have more of it.
Indeed, this can seem like a tricky question if you’re asked
it in the middle of watching a YouTube video of an elephant enthusiastically
playing piano, or a setter and a pigeon who appear to be best pals. Not all
this stuff is staged.
Labels:
Charles Darwin
/
Death
/
Ecclesiastes
/
Time and Chance
Friday, December 06, 2019
Too Hot to Handle: Friendship and Testimony
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Evangelism
/
Friendship
/
Too Hot to Handle
Thursday, December 05, 2019
The Change Is Gonna Do Us Good
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Change
/
Church
/
Modern Christianity
Wednesday, December 04, 2019
Wikipedia vs. Baptism
If there is a more misunderstood Christian practice in all
of the New Testament, I cannot think what it might be. I suspect even speaking in tongues can’t touch it with respect to the degree of confusion
produced by the teaching about it currently circulating.
How widespread and how deeply rooted are the misconceptions surrounding baptism? I suppose one might look at different denominational
opinions on the subject and assess them one by one, but I’m really more
interested in what the man on the street (and perhaps even in the pew) thinks
than in esoteric positions held by theologians that have failed to make an
impression on the masses.
Labels:
Baptism
/
Colossians
/
Galatians
/
Recycling
/
Romans
Tuesday, December 03, 2019
On Incoherence
Ideological incoherence is the hallmark of the political Left.
The Right has its own problems with consistency, of course,
and they are not trivial, but it is getting increasingly difficult to keep pace
with people who maintain the right to life for murderers and roast beef
sandwiches while upholding the right to kill human babies in the womb. What can
one say about folks who maintain diversity is strength ... except when it
is ideological diversity, of course. What can we say about people who argue for
the supremacy of science ... except when genetics plainly tells us a man is
a man and a woman is a woman. Then science is right out to lunch.
Well, we can say Christians are probably way too much like
them for our own good.
Labels:
Church
/
Consistency
/
Doctrine
/
Practice
Monday, December 02, 2019
Anonymous Asks (69)
“If it is true that ‘whoever says, “You fool!” will be liable to the hell of fire,’ then why did both Jesus and his apostles call people fools?”
Normally the questions answered in this series of posts come from anonymous sources, all of whom are (at least
to the best of my knowledge) actual people. Their problems may be real or
hypothetical (or, in at least one case, just plain old trolling), but
I answer them here because their writers make a decent effort to submit questions
we have good reason to believe might be of concern to our readers or people
they know.
In this case, I freely admit I submitted this one to myself just for the dubious pleasure of working
it through.
Labels:
Anonymous Asks
/
Apostle Paul
/
Christ
/
Foolishness
/
Judgment
Sunday, December 01, 2019
The Perils of Family Ties
Most books of the Bible have themes. Commentators generally do
a decent job of teasing out the more blatant ones and turning them into book
titles or pithy summaries. Thus Psalms is “the hymnbook of the remnant”, Hebrews
is concerned with “an unshakeable kingdom” and Mark’s is said to be the “gospel
of the Servant King”. To their credit,
in many cases these diligent students of God’s word also identify and share
with us less obvious recurring patterns that could easily be missed by first,
second and even third time readers.
In the books of Samuel, one of these recurring patterns is nepotism. It might
not rate the subtitle of a commentary, but it’s there all the same, threading its
way through the stories of Samuel, Saul and David, chronicling the perils of
family ties that are just a wee bit too tight, and their potentially injurious effects on the people of God.
Once you see it, you can’t stop seeing it.
Saturday, November 30, 2019
Time and Chance (12)
Where does the concept of a final judgment come from?
If you do a Google search or consult an online concordance, you can hardly fail to notice that the vast majority of Bible verses dealing with the subject are to be found in the New Testament. Men
seem to have always taken for granted that some kind of ultimate reckoning was inevitable,
but there is a surprising dearth of clear teaching on the subject in the earliest
books of the word of God.
In fact, we do not find incontestable references to a final,
general judgment appearing in scripture much prior to the 10th century B.C.
Labels:
Ecclesiastes
/
Justice
/
Time and Chance
Friday, November 29, 2019
Too Hot to Handle: How We Live and What We Believe
In which our regular writers toss around subjects a little more volatile than usual.
Colin Perkel of The National Post
has an update here on
our old friend Gretta Vosper, the United Church minister who believes in neither God nor the Bible. She is, in
Perkel’s words, “prepared to fight an unprecedented attempt to boot her from
the pulpit for her beliefs.” Or her unbeliefs, I guess.
Tom: The attempt by the United Church to give Gretta her gold watch and wish her all the best in
her future endeavors may be unprecedented, but it’s hardly a surprise, except
perhaps in that the United Church is taking some sort of stand here about
atheism in their pulpits.
Immanuel Can, does “the idea of an interventionist,
supernatural being on which so much church doctrine is based” belong to “an
outdated world view”? More importantly, can we separate how we live from what
we believe? Gretta thinks we can and should.
Labels:
Atheism
/
Recycling
/
Too Hot to Handle
/
United Church
Thursday, November 28, 2019
In Need of Analysis: Wake Up and Smell the Potpourri
The most recent version of this post is available here.
Labels:
Chameleon Christianity
/
Dick Keyes
/
In Need of Analysis
Wednesday, November 27, 2019
Inbox: Qualified Omniscience
“The word of the Lord came to Samuel: ‘I regret that I have made Saul king, for he has turned back from following me and has not performed my commandments.’ ”
“It is apparent this type of statement does not present a problem to you
but it might to the newcomer. It seems to contradict or at least not explain the
presumption or notion of God’s omniscience. How can God regret something that
he is, by definition, aware of from the beginning?”
Q’s email arrived just as I was sitting down to pick out a topic for today’s post.
We may have to change his name to “On-Cue Man”. There’s more to his missive,
including thoughts-in-progress about how such a conundrum might be resolved,
which you can find here, at the original post.
Labels:
1 Samuel
/
Inbox
/
Omniscience
/
Open Theism
Tuesday, November 26, 2019
Demons and Daily Living
Stand to Reason columnist Alan Shlemon
writes:
“To be honest, I believe in Satan and demons, but my belief in
them makes little difference in how I live. There are two reasons for
that. One, I often feel awkward talking about them for fear that people
might think I’m (spiritually) weird. Two, I don’t know exactly what they
do and what I can do to affect their activity.”
I think this is fairly common among Christians. More than a
few of us would confess that the oddballs who speak constantly of
demonic oppression or the “works of Satan” spook us just a little a bit.
Does belief in demons affect how we live? Not really, at
least not in any way we’d notice. Should it? That’s another question.
Labels:
Demons
/
Satan
/
Stand to Reason
Monday, November 25, 2019
Anonymous Asks (68)
“Can Christians use essential oils and aromatherapy?”
Today’s question is about a couple of modern trends, but
could well be about almost anything that is not intrinsically evil. “Can
Christians dance?” “Can Christians listen to popular music?” “Can Christian
girls wear Lululemons?” “Can Christians eat pork?”
The same biblical principles will help us with answering just about any “Can Christians [fill in the blank]?”
question.
Labels:
1 Corinthians
/
Anonymous Asks
/
Christian Testimony
/
Conscience
Sunday, November 24, 2019
Grace to the Undeserving
“May the Lord be with you, as he has been with my father.”
Jonathan, son of Israel’s first king, said these words to
David, who would become Israel’s second king. If you know the story, it may
initially appear he was laying on the irony so thick it required a backhoe, or
at least a team of oxen. His father Saul had a history we might optimistically
describe as checkered: initially anointed and blessed by God, but characterized
by rebellion and self-will. Told that he was to be rejected from being king, he fought God all the way.
He never seemed to realize he was fighting a losing
battle. That tells you everything you need to know about Saul.
Saturday, November 23, 2019
Time and Chance (11)
In interpreting any given statement in Ecclesiastes, we are
wise to look carefully at the Preacher’s current train of thought. Unlike the book of
Proverbs, for the most part Ecclesiastes is not a collection of unrelated bits
of wisdom. It is primarily an orderly series of arguments and observations.
Even where the direction of the writer’s thought flow does
not immediately jump out at us and we are tempted to think he may have drifted
off topic, he inevitably loops back to his theme. It is more than likely, then,
that the meaning of any obscure thing the Preacher says may be at very least
tangentially connected to his larger subject, as opposed to coming at us right
out of the blue.
Knowing this is fairly helpful when we consider our next two verses.
Labels:
Ecclesiastes
/
Life
/
Time and Chance
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)