WD writes, “How does the Spirit work in a
person’s life and how can one know He is?” An excellent question.
It’s also a question I wouldn’t dare try to
answer in a single blog post, even if I thought myself an expert on the Holy
Spirit’s guidance, which I don’t. But our reader’s question has been lurking at
the back of my mind as I’ve worked my way through William Trotter’s little
pamphlet on worship and ministry in the Spirit.
As much as impressions may be powerful
things, I remain cautious about attributing to the Holy Spirit anything that is merely
subjective, mystical or personal.
“The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.”This is not to say that we can know nothing of the Spirit’s work, but that my feelings, though often influenced by the Holy Spirit, are poor judges of whether he is at work in me in any given situation. I like Trotter’s writings a great deal, but I find the more subjective aspects of his thinking a little questionable.
Let’s limit ourselves (for now, at least)
to the subject of public participation in the gathering of a local church under
the Spirit’s guidance. Here’s the sort of thing I mean. From Trotter’s Letter 1:
“That the Holy Ghost is present, means more than that the meeting is not to be ordered by human and previous arrangement. He must order it if He be present. It means more than that any one is at liberty to take part in it. Nay, it means the opposite of this. True, there must be no human restrictions: but if He be present, no one must take any part but that which He assigns, and for which He qualifies him.” [emphasis mine]
Let’s think about that a bit.
Spiritual Qualifications
The second part of Trotter’s last assertion,
“and for which He qualifies him”, is a little less open to interpretation than
the first part.
We find a variety of opinions in local churches
about what constitutes a qualification for publicly participating in leading
the people of God. At the more restrictive end of the spectrum are the
requirements of ordination or a religious doctorate. At the more liberal end, even
unbelievers are occasionally permitted to address the congregation. Most
churches are somewhere in between these extremes, and those about which it may
be said that the guidance of the Holy Spirit is (at least occasionally)
operative within them must attempt some coherent and biblical standard.
Public Worship and Praise
For leading vocally in worship, praise and prayer, my understanding
is that one must be a man and, further, be indwelt by the Spirit of God
(absent which it is patently ridiculous to speak of his “guidance” at all). Other than occasional, self-imposed restrictions that one may choose to apply from time to time as personal circumstances demand, I hesitate to expand these qualifications much further.
Trotter seems to concur. From his third letter:
“The only priesthood besides [the priesthood of Jesus Christ] which exists at present is that which all saints share, and which all share alike. I could not suppose, therefore, that in an assembly of Christians the giving out of hymns, and prayer, thanksgiving, and praise (the expression of these I mean), should be confined, to those who are qualified of God to teach, or to exhort, or to preach the gospel.”
Until we can find even a hint of clerisy in
the pages of the New Testament (as opposed to the post-NT history of the Church),
I think Trotter’s point must stand.
Public Ministry
That said, public ministry is a different kettle of fish. I
believe (as Trotter did) that recognized
spiritual gift is a prerequisite to regular vocal participation (since it
is impossible for the spirits of gifted men to be subject to other gifted men if we cannot first identify who the gifted men are).
As Trotter puts it:
“God never designed all saints to take part in the public ministry of the word, or in conducting the worship of the assembly … I would refer you, first, to 1 Corinthians 12:29-30. ‘Are all apostles? are all prophets? are all teachers? are all workers of miracles? have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?’ There would be no meaning in these questions if the fact had not been self-evident, that such places in the body were filled by but a few.”
In any case, my point is that, rightly or
wrongly, most local churches have some
sort of metric by which they qualify those who may participate. It is not a completely random exercise.
Spiritual Assignment
But Trotter’s first assertion seems a
little dodgier. What does “No one must take any part but that which He assigns” mean exactly?
Trotter expands on his idea:
“What one does desire is, that the presence of the Holy Ghost Himself should be so realized as that no one should break silence except by His power, and under His direction; and that the sense of His presence should thus restrain us from all that is unworthy of Him, and of the name of Jesus in which we meet.”
As an aspiration, I like it. As a useful
metric of the Spirit’s guidance, I find myself a bit flummoxed. A “sense of His
presence” is by definition a feeling, a subjective impression or a mystical
experience of some sort, is it not?
I may feel very intensely that the Spirit
is leading me. Others may feel equally intensely that he is not.
How do you measure that?
Solemn Conviction and Full Persuasion
The problem of subjectivity raises itself
again in Trotter’s fourth letter:
“Suppose we were questioned at any time after the close of a meeting, Why did you give out such a hymn, or read such a chapter, or offer such a prayer, or speak such a word? Could we with a clear, good conscience reply, My only reason for doing so was the solemn conviction that it was my Master’s will? Could we say, I gave out that hymn because I was fully persuaded that it was the mind of the Spirit, that at that juncture in the meeting it should be sung? I read that chapter, or spoke that word, because I felt clear before God that it was the service my Lord and Master assigned me? I offered that prayer because I knew that the Spirit of God led me as the mouth of the assembly to ask those blessings which in it were implored. My brethren, could we answer thus, or is there not often the taking this part or that, without any such sense of responsibility to Christ?” [emphasis mine]
You see the problem, right? Solemn
conviction, full persuasion, clear feeling and personal knowledge are all
matters of opinion. It is good for us to have them, but there are some matters about which this is impossible.
What Can We Be Sure Of?
I can be solemnly convicted that as a man I
have an obligation to speak to God from time to time on behalf of my fellow
believers. The word of God assures me of that, so I’m never in doubt of it. I
can be fully persuaded that those with public speaking gifts should use them to
minister to the Body of Christ because the word of God assures me of it. If I
ever doubt it, I can flip open the pages of my New Testament and read it. I
count myself among this group of gifted teachers because many different Christians
in many different places over many years have assured me I am “apt to teach”.
This is a little more subjective than the first two truths, perhaps, but still something
in which I have confidence because it is measurable: I recall the occasions on
which this sort of encouragement came my way and the godly believers who were
the source of it, and even some of the words in which it came.
But beyond these quasi-measurables, where
are we? How do I know that a specific prayer at a specific time about a
specific subject was my Master’s will other than that I fancy it was the
case — or hope it was?
I don’t. I can’t. I’m not even sure we can
be expected to know such things.
Godly Suspension of Judgment
Surely the apostle anticipates such concerns.
Otherwise, why does he tell the Corinthians, “Let two or three prophets speak, and
let the others weigh what is said. If a revelation is made to another
sitting there, let the first be silent”?
But why should I be silenced when I am
bound by “solemn conviction” and “fully persuaded” of the Spirit’s guidance?
That other guy standing up to cut me off has got to be wrong, hasn’t he? The
Spirit is not disorderly; Paul is clear about that.
Certainty is a lovely thing. It makes
things so much simpler. And we may have great certainty about many of the
things we do before God in the presence of our fellow believers. But we can
never claim greater certainty than the word of God specifically provides us.
There is a time for what we might call “godly suspension of judgment”.
That is to say, I HOPE I’m expressing the
right truth at the right moment, and that the Holy Spirit guided me to do so.
But I must always recognize that I may be wrong about that. I may just be
beating my favourite doctrinal hobby horse for the umpteenth time. I may be
sincere but incorrect in my interpretation of scripture. So provision is made for
my fellow believers to get up and question or amend what I just said, or even
to take the meeting in a different direction.
If I insist on the primacy of my feelings
about my ministry or worship, I may end up forcing my own will on my brothers
and sisters in Christ for no reason more compelling than my own preferences
or ego.
My feelings cannot become the judge of
whether the Holy Spirit is at work in me. They just can’t.
No comments :
Post a Comment