In recent years the accusation that the Bible is anti-female has arisen more
and more frequently. The first post in this series dealt with the objection
that scripture is sexist because it uses the masculine gender to refer to God.
The second dealt with the objection that church order as taught in the New
Testament discriminates against women.
In this post, I’d like to examine a third:
Objection #3 — Doesn’t
the Old Testament Endorse the Victimization of Women?
Numerous incidents in which women were potential or actual
victims of sexual abuse, such as Lot’s offering his daughters to the Sodomites
and the rapes of Dinah and Tamar, are recorded in Scripture without being
concluded by an act of divine judgment or by any moral commentary. Some people
take this to mean that the God of the Bible does not consider the victimization
of women to be a crime, and that the Bible endorses such treatment of women.
Under the Law, if a man raped a woman pledged to be married,
he must be stoned to death; if a man raped a woman who was not pledged to be
married, he had to pay a fine, marry her immediately, and never divorce her as
long as he lived.
God certainly did regard rape as a violation and a crime, and expected it to be
punished accordingly.
However, since the
people of Israel were given the responsibility of carrying out God’s justice in
these matters, direct earthly punishment was not always inflicted as it ought
to have been. When Israel fell into a state of moral decline, they soon began
to neglect justice and the Law of God, and to exploit each other in every
conceivable way.
RJA
Republished by permission of the author
No comments :
Post a Comment