Early this year, Crawford Paul wrote about
how local churches can change to promote growth. One commenter gently took him to task:
“Post
what changes you want, and what it means to open discussions (women speaking?)
and be more specific.”
Short version: I jumped all over the commenter, who seemed generally opposed to change in the church and suggested
Mr. Paul’s posts were fostering discontent. It seemed to me he was reading
things into Crawford’s appeals for change that simply weren’t there (the
subject of women speaking was never addressed in the post). I even suggested
the commenter might be jumping at shadows.
Now I’m wondering if maybe I owe the poor
guy an apology. He may not be so paranoid after all.