In 1848, a song with the title All Things Bright and Beautiful appeared for the first time in Mrs. Cecil Alexander’s Hymns for Little Children. It subsequently became a Christian standard, and you are probably familiar with at least some of the lyrics (and almost surely the general concept), so I won’t include them here.
Also, they are considerably less amusing than the lyrics to the parody version written by British comedian Eric Idle for Monty Python’s Contractual Obligation Album in 1980.
Considerably More Amusing
I include a couple of verses to give you the general idea:
“All things dull and ugly, all creatures short and squat,
All things rude and nasty, the Lord God made the lot.Each nasty little hornet, each beastly little squid,
Who made the spiky urchin? Who made the sharks? He did.”
It goes on in much the same vein for four or five stanzas, but you get the picture. You can read the whole thing here if you care to, or if you don’t recall it (it has been nearly 35 years). As a teenager, I thought it was hilarious … until I didn’t.
My point is actually not to bang out a few paragraphs about how the members of Monty Python are (or were) horrible, irreverent human beings on their way to hell. They did, in fact, take more than a few shots at religion, but many of their targets made themselves fair game. No, my interest in this particular ball of snark hurled at the cultural wall is its uncanny accuracy. You see, they really do a nice job of making scripture’s point for it, at least on this topic.
When I first heard the song as a teenager, I was genuinely troubled by the unpleasant truth it rather snidely dredged up, because, yeah, God actually DID make urchins, sharks and all the horrible, devouring creatures found in nature. It seemed to me to take a perfectly predictable and eminently logical whack at the Christian worldview as I understood it.
I remember thinking at the time, that kind of needs an explanation, doesn’t it?
Answering a Fool
Frankly, it would be a very insubstantial system of theology — or in our case, a rather incomplete revelation — that did not provide some response to the question Mr. Idle raises, however frivolous his tone. Perhaps we should not answer a fool according to his folly, but let’s be generous and assume that behind the potshot at established religion is a genuine desire to have an answer. And if Monty Python failed to ask the question as humble seekers, perhaps one or two who, like me, heard the song as impressionable teenagers, may be genuinely troubled that there just might be some actual substance to Eric Idle’s observation.
Fortunately, we actually have a rather robust revelation. Not three chapters of scripture pass before this precise question is addressed. In Genesis 3:17, we read that God told Adam, “Cursed is the ground because of you.”
The serpent’s sin had consequences for the serpent. The woman’s sin had consequences for all women. Adam’s sin had consequences for the entire planet.
This is affirmed by the apostle Paul, who gives considerably more detail:
“For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation has been groaning together in the pains of childbirth until now.”
Eric Idle’s “nasty little hornet”, his “beastly little squid”, his sharks, his urchins, his snakes, ulcers, scabs and pox — every single one of them — are damaged goods. They are not the design of God, nor are they anything like the original creation, which God looked upon and testified that it was “good”. Far from being evidence against the truth of scripture and the goodness of God, his examples are confirmation of both.
A Testimony to Divine Brilliance
In fact, it now seems to me near-miraculous, after close to seven thousand years of the reign of Satan over this planet — at bare minimum — and the relentless exercise of self-will by fallen man to this day, that there is so much good to be said about nature. It is a testament to the brilliance of its creator that there is still so very much to delight us and to remind us of God about the natural world, when every effort is being made to destroy it.
Further evidence that the present condition of nature is neither the design nor desire of God is found in the book of Isaiah, where we read that one day, perhaps not too far down the road:
“The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together; and a little child shall lead them. The cow and the bear shall graze; their young shall lie down together; and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. The nursing child shall play over the hole of the cobra, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the adder’s den. They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain; for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea.”
How will this be accomplished? It is entirely the result of the work of the Lord Jesus Christ, called several times in Isaiah the “root of Jesse”. His death and resurrection are not just the potential salvation of mankind, but that of the entire corrupted planet.
So, yeah, right now we have sharks devouring, tigers clawing, preying mantises chomping on their mates and who-knows-what else. But one day we will see creation the way it was designed to be from the very beginning.
I suspect that “bright and beautiful” will not begin to do it justice.

Taking Isiah too literally leads to problems. Carnivores cannot digest grass. More concerningly, an ecosystem without predators leads to unchecked population growth followed by mass starvation.
ReplyDeleteGood point, Alisdair. But if we take into account that Isaiah is foretelling a change to the nature of ... er ... nature, the problems with the details disappear rather speedily. Carnivores as currently constituted do not eat grass, but who knows about divinely modified carnivores? An ecosystem without predators leads to unchecked population growth in a world where animals repopulate the planet at their current rate, but who knows what the rate of animal repopulation may be during Christ's millennial reign?
ReplyDeleteIn the end, who might be better equipped to repair the existing damage to a fallen world than the one who originally designed it?
"However frivolous the tone"?? You hear the tone of Idle's version as frivolous? The overall impression of the song and it's context in a satirical album may warrant a verdict of "frivolous," but the tone is nothing but fully earnest. No winking, no funny sound effects—nothing whatsoever in the tone of the performance to communicate frivolity. If the producers were to swap out the sheet music for the original lyrics, the end result would never be deemed irreverent or frivolous.
ReplyDeleteYou totally fail to appreciate the depth of this artistic creation.