“So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to
the glory of God.”
Eating and drinking to the glory of God?
What a strange idea. I get the “eating” part, and I get
the idea of “glorifying God”. But what does our action of eating have to do
with God’s glory?
That’s going to take some explaining.
A Meal and Love
I have a friend who has the gift of hospitality. Watching
him for many years has totally convinced me of the incredible power of that
gift. More than anyone I’ve ever met, he has a knack for making his home a
place where people feel welcomed, warmed, loved and fed.
You know the feeling. It’s that Thanksgiving Day or Christmas
glow that comes from sitting around a table of food prepared in love. For some
families, those are perhaps the only times they really feel close. For blessed
others, it’s maybe a monthly, weekly or even daily thing. Sad is the person who
has never experienced it at all. It’s one of life’s great pleasures.
And my friend has really opened my eyes to the tremendous
power of eating together. Hospitality breaks
bones. Even when all the right words have failed, it can win through. Hardened
hearts are softened and opened to the love of Christ when Christians serve
physical needs. I’ve seen that time and again.
So this much I have learned: that’s at least one way you
can “eat and drink to the glory of God”.
Sacred Sustenance
But the Bible has much more to say about eating than that. Once
you start looking at what it says on this theme, you can’t stop seeing cases.
For example, the passage at the start of this post actually
comes from a much larger section, starting in chapter 8 of 1 Corinthians,
and running until the end of chapter 11.
One fascinating feature of this section is how it bounces
back and forth between the subject of social eating and of the ceremonial
eating. It speaks about social
dinners in which meat sacrificed to idols is involved, and also about how
such social eating with pagans must be done so
as not to harm fellow believers. It talks about eating with a good
conscience in
a social setting, and eating at
home and about Christians
eating together and apart. It cautions against participating in eating
associated with idols and demons, and against thoughtless
eating and undiscerning
eating and greedy
eating and selfish
eating and corrupt
eating and offensive eating. It also talks about
free
eating and thankful
eating and God-glorifying
eating and communion
eating.
Lots of eating, eh? Maybe what’s most interesting about all
this is the smooth transition Paul makes between what we would regard normal,
social eating and the
implications for the Lord’s table. The point would seem to be twofold: firstly,
the Lord’s Supper has things to teach us
about social eating, and secondly, that normal
human eating has things to teach us about the Lord’s Supper.
For while the two are also distinct (and to some extent,
necessarily so), we see here that they are also not entirely dissociated. Our coming
together at the Lord’s Supper is not a practice so rarefied and alien to normal
human consumption that we are to regard it merely as a ceremony, and not as
real eating at all.
Eating has spiritual meaning.
Want More?
That’s not the only such passage. You have probably heard
that the early Christians in the book of Acts used to associate a “love feast”
with the Lord’s table. Eating and drinking together were part of the regular
responsibilities and spiritual activities of the church. Food and fellowship
were always united, both in theory and in practice.
If we rewind further, we get to the Old Testament teachings
about eating. What, have we forgotten that the first recorded act of eating had
massive
spiritual implications? And if we swing forward, we end up at the marriage supper
of the Lamb spoken of in Revelation 19:9, the great joy and anticipation
of every Christian.
Throughout the entire span of scripture, eating and
spirituality are intimately associated.
Dining at the Lord’s Table
Consider the model of our Lord at the Passover. The gospels
say, “as
they were eating”. Paul says, “after
supper”. The expression “at table” also occurs many times throughout the
gospels, each time indicating eating a meal together; and the same expression
is used by all the writers to describe the situation of the first Lord’s
Supper. So what we can gather is that before the ceremony, there was the
dining.
Come to think of it, we call it the “Lord’s Supper”, don’t
we? And yet, the way we conduct it, has there ever been so spare and small a meal?
The aspects of fellowship eating have been nearly entirely eliminated from our
current practice. We think of the Lord’s Supper as something quite different
from our own nourishment — something lofty, spiritual, refined and ritual —
not to be sullied with association with grubby human things, like actual
nourishment of the physical body or social interaction.
Maybe that’s a leftover effect of so many clergy-dominated
religious practices, where the bread and wine have been treated as purely
mystical tokens … some religionists going so far as even to teach that
they are magically translated into the actual flesh and blood of the Son of God
rather than the symbols of the same, and that the hands and lips of ordinary
sinners are unworthy to deal with these things — that privilege being the
exclusive province of some sanctimonious performer in a cloak. In our minds, the
foods at the table have ceased to be ordinary, to be gustatory, to be part of
normal dining at all, and have become only ceremonial.
Yet it’s interesting that in 1 Corinthians 11, not
discerning the body of Christ is identified with dishonoring your brothers and
sisters by eating as a kind of greedy solo-diner. The attitude in fellowship
eating is carried right over into the attitude of the Corinthians to each other
when
they were gathered to remember the Lord.
If we have come to think that it’s unspiritual to link our
common eating habits with our disposition at the Lord’s table, the apostle Paul
clearly thought otherwise.
The Ceremonial Aspects of Dinner
To look at the problem from another perspective, we might
say also that we have lost the ultimate and spiritual significance of ordinary
eating.
To eat has become for us a routine activity, a mere
necessity, an ingesting of nutrient material so as to be able to pursue other
activities, rather than a thing that has any special meaning of its own. Even
when we are together with others, sharing fellowship around a meal, we may
often think of it as no more than a crass necessity — we’ve all got to eat —
or a practical step toward some other social program. But in scripture, to sit
down and eat with somebody has many rich symbolic, spiritual implications.
The Old Testament custom of keeping kosher speaks powerfully
of this. It says, “We cannot be nourished in each other’s presence, you and I;
for you are not clean, and what sustains you is not for me. We are not in the
same covenant, and can have no fellowship. First there must be the
washing, the cleansing, and only
then we may eat together.” This was, of course, a symbol of the alienation
of sinful man from holy God. And symbolism this is what made Peter’s
breaking of kosher custom to eat with Gentiles so radical and so shocking
to his fellow Jews.
Recall that it was for sharing
a table with prostitutes, tax collectors and other sinners that the Lord Jesus
was called to account by the Pharisees. They were scandalized by the
implication of his participating with these low-lives by way of eating together
with them. They could not believe he could nourish himself in their presence
and remain unconcerned by the implied fellowship with them, and did not
understand that what the Lord had made clean was clean indeed. They knew that his
eating in this way was more than a mere meal; it was a co-identification, fellowship
with sinners. They understood that there was more than dinner going on, that
there were serious spiritual implications to the situation.
Or again, consider how Paul reminds the Corinthians that one
of the things they were never to do with anybody who claimed to be a Christian
“brother”, but was actually a swindler, idolater, covetous, drunken or immoral,
was to eat with him. To do so would be to
nourish oneself in the presence of a wicked imposter, a betrayer of the faith.
There was meaning to the ordinary act of sharing a meal with such a person.
We could go on, and at great length. There is a great deal
said about the deeper, spiritual implications of ordinary eating-together. (Norman
Wirzba, for example, has a 2011 book called Food
and Faith: A Theology of Eating, which covers this issue in depth.) Those
who have an appetite for more on the subject might find themselves nourished
there.
Making Eating Sacred
But at this point, you might well wonder where all of this
talk of eating and ceremony is heading.
Relax. I’m not pitching that we should have more potluck
dinners at church (as good an idea as that might be). But we might well want to
consider if we are missing anything if we never
take time to nourish ourselves and each other in bodily presence around a
dinner table. What does it mean if we don’t want to share food with people we
claim to love? How would serving each other in this way, and feeling blessed
together change the mood of our fellowship?
And what difference would the sharing of food make to our
sharing of the gospel? One of the genius innovations of the Alpha program has
always been the providing of a simple meal before any spiritual discussion goes
on. Eating together produces a chemical change in the conversation that ensues.
It’s important to understand how powerful and spiritual such an effect can be. If
somebody takes care of your physical needs and makes you feel warmed and fed,
it’s not so easy immediately afterward to hate them or oppose what they have to say.
We might also ask ourselves if hospitality is so optional a
thing for Christians as we have sometimes come to act as if it is. If we cannot
share our homes and tables with other Christians, what are we missing? What are
we failing to signal? What are we losing from our understanding and our
practical experience of fellowship, if something so heavily emphasized in scripture
is simply absent from our regular practice? Is it even possible were are losing
out on important spiritual realizations and essential aspects of spiritual life
simply because we have divorced eating together from its real meaning?
Have we de-ceremonialized ordinary eating to the point where
it’s meaningless to us?
Making Ceremony Reality
Now to the reverse. Have we so ceremonialized the Lord’s table
that we see it only as a religious performance, one that has nothing much to do
with nutrition or fellowship with those who are there with us? Do we forget
that when Christ said, “This is my body” that it was given for the sustaining
of your life, and of our lives, as one, together, in him?
Do we miss the importance of the Lord’s violation of
ordinary dinner protocols in presenting one bread and one cup, in specific, to
many gathered eaters, because we don’t think of what he was doing as a “dinner”
at all, but just as a ceremony? Do we overlook his intention to be the sole
source of our mutual spiritual nourishment, our sustenance-every-day? Do we
fail to meditate on the beautiful paradox that our spiritual viability was
going to be bought by the tearing of his flesh and the pouring out of his
blood, so that we might live and move in him? That just as our food becomes an
actual chemical part of who we are, and empowers the regeneration of our
bodies, so too Christ is to become life itself to us?
Settling Our Meal
One thing that eating together and the Lord’s Supper have in
common is the emphasis on sharing, on co-participation, on equal gathering around
one Source of nourishment:
“The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread.”
“We all partake of the One.” Let that thought sink down into
you for a minute. All the believers are gathered around an eating experience,
all focused on the one thing that sustains their lives and gives them the
strength to go on. And that one thing is the Bread of Life. They are no longer
several, but for that moment, are unified in him. It glorifies God whenever his
people eat together in this manner … not only at the ceremonial table, but
at all times.
The Big Point
So what’s the point?
I asked my friend, the one so skilled in hospitality, how he
would put it, if he had only one sentence. And this is what he said: “Remember
that when we eat, it is a testimony to the fact that we live in a world
surrounded with the grace of God.”
Wow.
Every bite we eat is given to us for our joy and blessing,
by a God who has pulled all things in our environment together to nourish and
strengthen us. Eating, when it is conditioned by the realization of our debt to
God, is an act of worship. It is also a testimony to the world that there is
Someone who has given us all things, and to whom we owe our love and duty in
return.
No unbeliever can eat like that.
And it’s true when our meals are abundant, but no less true
when they are meager and far between. One can give thanks over loaves and
fishes, or over a great feast. Whenever we eat, and especially when we eat
together, we ought to eat with joy, with generosity, with unselfishness, and
with thanksgiving. We need to eat gratefully, and as an act of worship.
And that is why Christians pray before they eat.
A Final Story
I end with a true story.
I was in the mountains of Honduras, in a remote village. We
were there to do a water project. Though none of us spoke Spanish, we worked in
the early part of the day with the villagers. And in the evening, we sat on the
porch of the one room cinder-block schoolhouse the government had built for the
region.
We were having lunch, which was peanut butter sandwiches,
and little more. But we were laughing, carrying on, and pretty much just
enjoying each other’s fellowship the way Christians can do.
An elderly woman walked up from the village, and stood at a
distance, looking at us. We asked our translator, “Can we give her a sandwich?”
The translator halted, but then said yes. So we did.
But she sat down on one side of the porch, with the sandwich
in her lap, both hands on it, and looked at us. She didn’t eat. We were
concerned, and asked the translator to go and ask her if something was wrong.
The translator came back to us. “What did she say?” we
asked.
“I asked her what she was doing. She said she was watching.”
We looked perplexed.
The translator continued, “I asked her what she was
watching. She said, ‘The banquet in Heaven.’ ”
There it is.
Guess who’s coming to dinner?
We all are.
No comments :
Post a Comment