I was listening to a preacher a few days ago … just
online, you know. And he said something that’s stayed with me and keeps running
around in my head, because it’s just so smart.
It’s something that solves a perplexity for me that I have to confess I’ve
struggled with for years. I want to pass it on to you.
My perplexity has been this: When do you just say what the
Bible says, and when do you hold back?
The preacher said this: “I’m through protecting people from scripture.”
He went on: “I’m not going to explain it, apologize for it,
or keep you from knowing about any of it. It’s the word of God. It is what it
is. Deal with it.”
Wow. Right on, brother. That’s 100% the right answer.
Why Does It Need to Be Said?
It needs to be said because I think we’ve forgotten it.
I’ve gotten used to calculating and measuring how much of the truth I try
to put on the table in any conversation. And as part of that, I’ve sometimes
struggled with whether to tell somebody or not about some specific thing the
Bible says … at least, at that particular time. I’ve been trying to be
judicious, timely, strategic, even. Mostly, I’ve been just trying to get it
right.
And I’m not alone in that struggle. I know other
Christians who’ve puzzled over that one, too. Maybe you’re one of them. In a
way, I hope you are: because if you’ve never asked yourself Is this the
right moment?, then you’ve probably never witnessed. Am I right?
Seeker-Sensitivity
But the problem is also larger than just us. It’s a more
general problem, one that I think all Christians face. You might remember
how back in the 1980s many churches went through a vogue for becoming “seeker
sensitive”. The idea of many at that time was that unbelievers are just roving
around out there in the world looking for answers and hoping to find a church
to settle into. They were all “seekers”, you see: they were on the way to
locating the right answers, and the job of a sensitive Christian was to keep
facilitating their search, encouraging them to come in, ask questions, learn,
and gradually slide into faith like a weary laborer slides into a warm bath at
the end of a hard day … casually, gradually, naturally and with a sort of
spiritual “sigh of relief”.
This was a reaction against unduly direct and harsh
evangelistic approaches. Too much was said too early about sin and hell and
judgment. Instead, the approach should be winsome, gentle, persuasive and
welcoming … no harsh or jarring theological note should be put forward;
rather, that stuff needed to recede a bit into the background … not gone exactly, but not pushed, not
presented first, not foregrounded.
Becoming “seeker sensitive” meant you had to soft pedal (or
softly peddle) certain things in scripture that might offend well-meaning and delicate
“seekers”. And there was a little something to that. There certainly are people
for whom a gentle approach is preferable. There are sincere seekers who are
already well down the road to salvation before we encounter them. And there are
even people who have already a strong idea of their own sin and their personal
distance from God. And there are folks who have been buffeted by unkind and
unsubtle approaches from others, and so have come to associate evangelism with
harshness. Such people do need the soft-glove treatment: fair enough.
But the seeker-sensitivity movement took that sort of
description to be characteristic of most unbelievers; indeed, of maybe all of
them. And so it contended the church should modify its theology to speak that
way to everyone. If there was a place left for a direct approach — for
rebuke, for indictment of sin, for conviction and repentance, or for
fire-and-brimstone, it would not be in the church any longer. Maybe that sort
of thing could still happen in personal evangelism, but the seeker-sensitive
types wouldn’t think much of that if it did.
Ah, the Good Intentions …
There were good intentions in that movement. But there was
also something tremendously arrogant. What was arrogant was the idea that God
had put his truth rather a little too directly at times, and it was up to us
sensitive Christians to make selective editorial decisions on his behalf, so as
to make sure the message came across “in the best light”. So there were things
we didn’t talk about much anymore — things like the enmity between the
sinner and a holy God, the judgments of God against things like drunkenness,
sexual perversions, gossip, worldliness, selfishness and especially
materialism. Calls for repentance were reframed as needs for a rethink, and judgment
and the lake of fire … well, they were pretty much left for folks to
discover for themselves after they’d
already bought into the program.
It was as if the salvation message had become like underwear —
something everyone might have, but
one really ought not to talk about in polite company.
How shameful.
Shame
And shame was driving the strategy, actually. People were
ashamed of what the gospel actually said. They were ashamed before their
neighbors, who might think us harsh and judgmental if we spoke as the Bible
speaks. They were ashamed of themselves, because many of them really didn’t
understand the theology they were trying to share, and so couldn’t properly
explain why repentance was so demanding or why judgment was impending even for
people who seemed socially respectable. They were afraid of inciting opposition
to the gospel, as well; not just because rejection, abuse or persecution might
follow, but also because they feared it would be their fault if the “seekers”
didn’t buy in.
And they were ashamed to be asked hard questions. They
didn’t know the answers. The less you demand of your listeners, the fewer their
questions tend to become. So it was very attractive to keep the message sotto voce. It made for less trouble.
So they softened the message to minimize the shame. They
selected, accommodated, apologized, worked gently, and hoped that in the end
God would still do his work. Because they didn’t feel at all confident about
their own.
Protecting
But what were we doing? We were protecting. We were
protecting ourselves from trouble, yes; but underneath this, we also somehow
felt that God had to be protected from his alarming tendency to speak too
abruptly.
He’s like that, you know.
While everybody from liberal Christians to raw atheists
seems to know and love the passage that says, “Judge
not, that you be not judged”, nobody ever points out that there’s more than
twice as much said about reasons to
judge than not to judge. And it’s not
often pointed out that “gentle Jesus, meek and mild” booted hypocrites out of
the temple, and spoke at far greater length and in much more detail about hell
than he ever did about heaven, and thundered at the Pharisees, “You
children of hell!”
It was as though we thought the
Lord didn’t know how he was coming across. And we, the late 20th century
believers, were in the best position to counsel him on how the message ought to
go. After all, were we not the children of the age of advertising, of public
relations and political correctness? It was as though we thought we could help
the Savior navigate the difficult waters of modern sensibilities, and in the
end, still help him make his point.
We didn’t mean to be that arrogant: we just were.
And Today
Now it’s the 21st century. In retrospect, the “seeker
sensitive” churches just didn’t really work out. They did produce a brief
increase in church attendance, but it’s long ago become clear that not all that
growth was genuine. The trade-off we had made earlier resulted in bloated
numbers but a weakening of doctrine and of discipleship, one that has still
only somewhat recovered from its low point late in the last century.
And now, as all churches are strained or shut down
completely by COVID measures, we can see how feeble it is to run a church the
way we did. The government can destroy all that we have built with no more than
a single edict. And what will be left? Only what the believers individually
knew, the ones among them who were becoming strong, mature, doctrinally-strong
and committed — these ones are undaunted by the present crisis. Everybody else
is at sea.
Was God not right all along? Did the all-wise God not know
exactly what needed to be said, in what proportions, to whom and when? Could
not the Spirit of God have given us the timing to know what to point to and
when, if only we had been busy ourselves in ingesting and living the whole
counsel of God? How foolish we were to select, edit and apologize for truth. What
were we thinking?
Action Plan
So I’m through protecting people from scripture, too. Let
the word of God say what it says. Let it offend if it will. Let it be ever so
blunt, harsh and indifferent to the sensibilities of listeners, I will
speak what it says. And I will learn it so I can speak it. I will
study it every day, and ponder it, and turn it over in my mind, and pray until
I understand it. And I will face up to the world’s questions. I will
speak with my neighbors and friends, and say “Thus saith the Lord” without
dodging, softening or apologizing. It is what it is. Let the word of God go
forth, and let it go forth from my lips. So I will not back off of any
topic. And when I don’t know the answers, I will go and look until
the Lord leads me into truth.
And if there is anybody I have not been speaking to, I will
do it now. There are some I have been waiting for. I thought that
maybe I should hold off until they become more receptive, or give me a
natural “in” for a spiritual conversation. Was there a time for such caution? Maybe
there was: it is not now.
For now, brothers and sisters, I think we are in the
end times. I am no prophet, nor do I pretend to be. But as I look
over the world landscape today, I can see the very real possibility that
from now on, the days are short until Christ comes. If he chooses to forbear,
it will not harm me if I have stepped up my game; if he does come soon, I want
to be found speaking the whole truth about the word of God, and preeminently to
be sharing the message of salvation at all costs, in all places, in just the
way he commanded me to do.
And my friends? My business associates? My family? All those
difficult people I shied away from speaking to? The time for hiding is
over. Situation critical: make your move now. Speak up, tell the truth, and
bring as many as you can. Trust and obey. Say it now.
Are you with me?
The Point
I’m through protecting people from the word of God.
Are you?
No comments :
Post a Comment